Puma
Latest Judgments
Total 627 Consumer Court Cases Against Puma.
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mr. Baninder Singh Sroan
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Moudgil, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
During the course of arguments, it was noticed that power of attorney, on the basis of which, this complaint has been filed, does not authorize the attorney to undertake any legal proceedings against the Opposite Parties. Furthermore, in subsequent special power of attorney place...
Case Number: 556
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2017
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Upvinder Singh Dhall
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/128/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/80/20161. Upvinder Singh DhallS/o Sh. Upkar Singh Dhall, Both resident of H.No. 2234, Second Floor, Sector 38 C, Chandigarh............Appellant(s)Versus1. Puma R...
Case Number: 128
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Parveen Mangla
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHExecution Application No. EA/129/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/79/20161. Parveen Manglas/o Sh. Subhash Mangla, R/o H.No. 1757, Nirwana Society Sec 49-B, Chd............Appellant(s)Versus1. Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd.a Co. incorpo...
Case Number: 129
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Deepak Saluja
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
It is stated by Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate, Counsel for the Decree Holders/complainants that in terms of interim order passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi on 06.09.2016, some amount stood paid to the Decree Holders/complainants. App...
Case Number: 130
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Vikas Nijhawan
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
It is stated by Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate, Counsel for the Decree Holder/complainant that in terms of interim order passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi on 06.09.2016, some amount stood paid to the Decree Holders/complainants. Appea...
Case Number: 131
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
Puma Realtors Private Limited V/S Ritesh Trikha
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
It is stated by Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate, Counsel for the Decree Holders/complainants that in terms of interim order passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi on 06.09.2016, some amount stood paid to the Decree Holders/complainants. App...
Case Number: 132
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2017
M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Ashish Kumar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K.D.S. Sodhi & Rajeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to approach the competent Fora. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties free of charge....
Case Number: 116
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Limited V/S Mrs. Nirmal Milkha Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajbir Singh Guron, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:544 of 2016Date of Institution:02.09.2016Date of Decision:09.02.2017Mrs. Nirmal Milkha Singh, Aged _ Years, W/o Sh. Milkha Singh, Resident of House No.725, Sector 8-C, Chandigarh.……Compl...
Case Number: 544
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Shima Saggar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Paras Money Goyal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:690 of 2016Date of Institution:14.10.2016Date of Decision:09.02.2017Shima Saggar wife of Shri Sarbjit R. Saggar, resident of House No.2237, Sector 48-C, Chandigarh, Correspondence Address: #436, Block...
Case Number: 690
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2017
Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd. V/S Harvinder Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Vipul Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:595 of 2016Date of Institution:15.09.2016Date of Decision:07.02.2017Ms. Harvinder Kaur w/o Inderjit Singh r/o H.No.951, Phase 3B-2, Mohali, Punjab.……Complainant.VersusM/s Puma Realtors P...
Case Number: 595
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Puma in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Puma ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Puma under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.