
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better facts and also on taking issue of charging PLC with the Opposite Parties, as per his statement, the adjoining vacant plot has been conv...
Case Number: 445
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh, adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
As per office report, rejoinder filed in the office, which is taken on record. Copy of the same has been supplied to the Counsel opposite. The matter has amicably been settled between the parties. On getting instructions from Sh.Puneet Popli, Senior Manager of the Opposite P...
Case Number: 133
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Satinder Singh Randhawa,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
On the last date of hearing i.e. 12.05.2017 the following order was passed by this Commission :-“Today, in Court, Counsel for the Judgment Debtors has handed over two cheques bearing Nos.541580 & 541579, both dated 10.05.2017 in the sum of Rs.4,87,007/- and Rs.4,87...
Case Number: 168
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2017
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the judgment debtors has placed on record copy of order dated 23.05.2017 passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in First Appeal No.614 of 2017, which reads thus :-“Notice on admission to the Respondents returnable on 19....
Case Number: 175
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gagandeep Singh Brar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
Dated: 23/05/2017ORDER At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. It is stated by Counsel for Opposite Party No.1 that Opposite Party No.1 will return an amount of Rs.21,71,800/- to the complainant with interest @8.5% p.a. (simple) from t...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Nitin Gupta & Gaurav Gupta
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
Dated: 19/05/2017ORDER Photocopy of Settlement Deed has been placed on record. Counsel for both the parties state that in view of above, this complaint has become infructuous. In view of above, the complaint stands disposed of having been rendered infructuous. Certified copies o...
Case Number: 685
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No.:930 of 2016Date of Institution:16.12.2016Date of Decision:19.05.2017Mr.Rakesh Kumar son of Sh.Kamer Chand Gogna, aged 40 years, House No.99, Milk Colony, Dhanas, Chandigarh.Mr.Raju Gogna son of Sh.M.L...
Case Number: 930
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Geeta Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file a-fresh one after giving better particulars. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Spare copy be retained for the office record an...
Case Number: 413
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
Omaxe Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Somesh Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:966 of 2016Date of Institution:28.12.2016Date of Decision:17.05.2017Megh Raj aged about 67 years, son of Late Sh.Mohan Dass, resident of House No.1184, Phase-9, Mohali (SAS Nagar).……Comp...
Case Number: 966
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, Panchkula First Appeal No : 704 of 2016Date of Institution: 01.08.2016Date of Decision : 16.05.2017M/s Omaxe Limited, Registered Officer: 7, Local Shopping Centre, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019 through its authorized representativ...
Case Number: 704
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.