
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MANOJ LAKHOTIA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Consumer Complaint No.268 of 2019Date of the Institution:13.08.2019Date of Decision: 29.11.20211. Vikram Singh S/o Sh.Ajit Singh2. Mrs. Preeti Singh W/o Sh.Vikram Singh. Both R/o H.No.1421, Sector-3, Rohtak, Haryan...
Case Number: 268
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2019
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MUNISH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2First Appeal No. A/499/2017( Date of Filing : 21 Apr 2017 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 13/02/2017 in Case No. 122/2016 of District Palwal)1. THE MANAGER OMAXEHOUSE NO 7 LOCAL SHOPPING CENTRE BUILDING NO 9 NEW DELHI 110019...........Appellant(s)Versus1. SAVITA DEVIW...
Case Number: 499
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-11-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.Chadha
Respondant Advocate Ashok Shukla
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2009/399( Date of Filing : 09 Mar 2009 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. M/S Omaxe Construction Ltd.a..........
Case Number: 2009
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2021
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. SUVIGYA AWASTHY & MR. LOVE GUPTA
...
Case Number: 446
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-10-2021
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. S.K. Sharma
Respondant Advocate Sh. A.S. Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. 413/2018( Date of Filing : 06 Sep 2018 )1. Mukesh Barr S/o Sh. Randhir Singh S/o Chandan Singh r/o H.No. 167, Sec. 14, Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Ltd.Omaxe City, Rohtak Office S...
Case Number: 413
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 25-08-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhineet Taneja Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:10 of 2020Date of Institution:07.01.2020Date of Decision:16.08.2021Sarita Kalia w/o Sh.Sandeep Kalia, R/o Flat No.797, Second Floor, Omaxe Cassia, New Chandigarh.VersusOmaxe Chandigarh Extension Deve...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2021
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ajay Sheoran
Respondant Advocate Sh. Mannu Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/20/214( Date of Filing : 02 Jul 2020 )1. Anitaage 40 years W/o Sh. Sukhchain, r/o village Kheri Sadh, Kheri Sadh 42, Distt. Rohtak (Haryana)............Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Happy Home-II...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2020
|
Date of Upload: 11-08-2021
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ajay Sheoran
Respondant Advocate Sh. Mannu Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/20/215( Date of Filing : 02 Jul 2020 )1. RambirS/o Sh. Rampat, r/o village Kheri Sadh, Kheri Sadh 42, Distt. Rohtak (Haryana)............Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Happy Home-II Rohtak,Jhajjar...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2020
|
Date of Upload: 11-08-2021
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:403 of 2020Date of Institution:25.08.2020Date of Decision:03.08.20211] Sanjay Kansal son of Late Sh.K.K.Kansal, aged 51 years,2] Vandana Kansal wife of Sh.Sanjay Kansal, aged 48 years,Corresp...
Case Number: 403
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2020
|
Date of Upload: 20-08-2021
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. PRAVIN BAHADUR & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 468 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 08/12/2020 in Complaint No. 1084/2016 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. M/S. OMAXE LTD.10, LOCAL SHOPPING COMPLEX, KALKAJISouth EastDELHI...........Appellant(s)Versus1. N...
Case Number: 468
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2021
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2021
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.