Omaxe
Latest Judgments
Total 1203 Consumer Court Cases Against Omaxe.
M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Lakhbir Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Munish Gupta, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:69 of 2018Date of Institution:13.02.2018Date of Decision:10.02.2021Lakhbir Singh s/o Sukhdev Singh, resident of Village Dulchi Ke, District Ferozepur, Punjab.……ComplainantV e r s u sM/s ...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2021
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Mrs. Anuradha Aima
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arjun Grover Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:248 of 2019Date of Institution:07.11.2019Date of Decision:27.01.2021Mrs. Anuradha Aima w/o Sh.Sandeep Aima, r/o P.O. Box : 34637, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates - 0.Mr. Sandeep Aima s/o Sh.Udhey Kum...
Case Number: 248
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2021
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Shri Akhil Gupta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amitabh Suri Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:136 of 2019Date of Institution:06.06.2019Date of Decision:21.01.2021Sh.Akhil Gupta aged 39 years son of Sh.Munna Lal Gupta resident of 99 Ward No.3 PAHADI GALI Vikas Nagar, Dehradun, Uttrakhand.Smt. P...
Case Number: 136
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2019
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2021
Omaxe Happy Home II, V/S Smt. Rakha Rani
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Satpal Vats
Respondant Advocate Sh. Mannu Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/19/691( Date of Filing : 11 Dec 2019 )1. Smt. Rakha Rani(Age 50 Years) W/o Sh. Shyam Phul Old Address 587/9, Babra Mohalla now R/o at H.No. 2405/3, near Laxmi Dharamkanta, old Jind Road, Rohtak....
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2019
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2021
The Manager, Omaxe Chandigarh Extn. Dev. P. Ltd. V/S Dr. Prabir Das
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT HELD INDISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-IU.T. CHANDIGARHCONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.84 OF 2020DR.PRABIR DAS & ANR.VS.THE MANAGER, OMAXE CHANDIGARH EXTN. DEV. P. LTD. & OTHERSPRESENT: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT (JUDGE OF THE LOK ...
Case Number: 84
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2020
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2020
m/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Seema
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Onkar Rai & Neeraj Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:132 of 2019Date of Institution:28.05.2019Date of Decision:09.12.2020Seema wife of Onkar Rai, House No.45, Type-III, PGI Campus, Sector 12, Chandigarh.VersusThe M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Develope...
Case Number: 132
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2020
OMAXE BUILDHOME LTD. & ANR. V/S SH. UDAY SHANKAR LAL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SWETANK SHANTANU
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986Complaint Case No. CC/236/2019( Date of Filing : 01 Mar 2019 )1. SH. UDAY SHANKAR LAL AIR HEAD QUARTER, R.K. PURAM, WEST BLOCK-6, N.D............Complainant(s)Versus1. OMAXE BUILDHOME LTD...
Case Number: 236
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 30-12-2020
m/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sonika Bhardwaj
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate H.S. Awasthi Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:58 of 2019Date of Institution:12.03.2019Date of Decision:07.10.2020Sonika Bhardwaj wife of Sh.Harinder Kumar son of Sh.D. Sharma, aged 51 years, resident of House No.1001-H, Sector 21, Panchkula.Hari...
Case Number: 58
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2020
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sh. Kanwal Jeet Saini
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arjun Grover Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHMiscellaneous Application No.321 of 2020in(Complaint Case No. 428 of 2018) Sh.Kanwal Jeet Saini and anr. Vs. Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited.Present through Video Conferencing:- Sh.Arjun Grover, Ad...
Case Number: 321
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2020
|
Date of Upload: 27-10-2020
Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sh. Suresh Pal Saini
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arjun Grover Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHMiscellaneous Application No.320 of 2020in(Complaint Case No. 429 of 2018) Sh.Suresh Pal Saini and anr. Vs. Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Private Limited.Present through Video Conferencing:- Sh.Arjun Grover, Adv...
Case Number: 320
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2020
|
Date of Upload: 27-10-2020
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.