
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K.S.PANNU
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Consumer Complaint No.476 of 2018 Date of Institution:20.08.2018Date of Decision: 20.05.2022Arun Kumar aged 38 years, son of Shri Sube Singh, R/o House No.800/27, Model Town, near Medical Mod, Rohtak. .….Compl...
Case Number: 476
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2022
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Verma
Respondant Advocate
Before the National Lok Adalat held in District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., ChandigarhCONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 77 OF 2022Neeraj Malhotra & anr.Vs M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. & anr.BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMA...
Case Number: 77
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2022
|
Date of Upload: 20-05-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikas Agarwal
Respondant Advocate Sarvesh Kumar Gaupta
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. C/2013/204( Date of Filing : 24 Dec 2013 )1. Pradeep Narain Singha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Buildhome Pvt Ltda............Opp.Party(...
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-06-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikas Agarwal
Respondant Advocate Sarvesh Kumar Gaupta
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. C/2013/204( Date of Filing : 24 Dec 2013 )1. Pradeep Narain Singha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Buildhome Pvt Ltda............Opp.Party(...
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-06-2022
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Devender Hooda
Respondant Advocate Sh. A.S. Malik
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/19/403( Date of Filing : 20 Aug 2019 )1. Ram Mehar Singh MalikS/o Raghbir Singh, R/o H.no. 275-802 ward no. 13, copra colony, Gohana District Sonipat............Complainant(s)Versus1. Omaxe Ltd....
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 20-08-2019
|
Date of Upload: 29-04-2022
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Satpal Vats
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Execution Application No. EA/21/18( Date of Filing : 23 Feb 2021 )InComplaint Case No. CC/19/6911. Smt. Rakha RaniW/o Sh. Shyam Phul Old Address 587/9, Babra Mohalla now R/o at H.No. 2405/3, near Laxmi Dharamkanta, o...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2021
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KNOWLEX LAW ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate M/S. SUNIL MUND & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 2380 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 15/09/2017 in Complaint No. 1419/2017 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ANITAW/O. SH. SURESH KUMAR GARG, R/O. FLAT NO. 79, SECOND FLOOR, NORTH AVENUE-II, OMAXE CITY, BAHA...
Case Number: 2380
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2022
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate RK Chand adv
Respondant Advocate Nitin Kapila adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, LUDHIANA. Complaint No: 218 dated 04.03.2014. Date of decision: 11.02.2022.Yash Pal Gupta aged 69 years son of Sh. Kahan Chand Gupta,Rohit Gupta aged 41 years son of Sh. Yash Pal Gupta, both residents of House No.163, Major Gurdia...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 18-02-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ankur Gupta Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/59/2020Date of Institution:28/02/2020Date of Decision:18/01/20221. Baljeet Singh S/o Sh. Amarjit Singh, R/o B-7, Lane 4, Sector 1, New Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.2. Jyotsana Negi D/o Sh. Amarjit ...
Case Number: 59
|
Date of Filing: 28-02-2020
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:111 of 2020Date of Institution:18.06.2020Date of Decision:29.11.2021Sheshpal Sharma S/o Sh. Balkishan, R/o House No. 250B, Sector-43-A, Chandigarh..........ComplainantVersusM/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extens...
Case Number: 111
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2020
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2021
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Omaxe in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Omaxe ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Omaxe under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.