
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Vinod Verma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated : 28/09/2016ORDER Sh. Vinod Verma, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would ...
Case Number: 809
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate Indu Bala Adv.
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Forum LudhianaRoom No. 7, Old Wing, New Judicial Complex, Ferozepur Road Ludhiana.Final Order Complaint Case No. CC/16/5071. Harpreet singhdugri Ludhiana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Motorola customer serviceDLF cyber Green city,Gurgaon............Opp.Party(...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Dated : 06/09/2016ORDER An application for withdrawal of the E.A. and copy of the cheque have been filed on behalf of the complainant. Sh. Navneet Verma, complainant has appended a note on the first page of the execution application that he withdraws the E.A./133/2016 being fully...
Case Number: 133
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/267/2016Date of Institution:20/04/2016Date of Decision:29/08/2016Preet Kamal Singh S/o Sh. Avtar Singh Sachdeva, R/o H.No.480, Phase-10, Mohali, Punjab – 160062.…&hellip...
Case Number: 267
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/741/2015Date of Institution:03/11/2015Date of Decision:29/08/2016Rakesh Kumar, O/o AGE, GE (U), Chandimandir Cantt., Panchkula, at present R/o H.No.713, Sec.16, Chandigarh.….....
Case Number: 741
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate Rohit Kumar,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:326/2016Date of Institution:10.05.2016Date of Decision:26/08/2016Vikram Samyal s/o Sh.Kuldeep Samyal r/o V&PO Dari, District Kangra (H.P.). ... Complainant.Versus1. Motorola Mobility India (P) ...
Case Number: 326
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2016
Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM SESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE - 20PRESENT SRI.SYED ANSER KHALEEM, B.SC., B.ED., LL.B., PRESIDENTSRI.H.JANARDHAN, B.A.L., LL.B., MEMBERComplaint Case No. CC/857/20161. Siddhant Agarwal,Aged about 22 years, R/at flat No.0...
Case Number: 857
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2016
Court Name: Ujjain
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM UJJAIN VISHALA VIKAS BHAWAN BHARATPURIUJJAIN (MP) PIN 456001PHONE NO. -0734-2511435Execution Application No. EA/32/2016InComplaint Case No. cc/2008/5211. pandit yogesh vyasujjain...........Appellant(s)Versus1. motorola india ujjain..........
Case Number: 32
|
Date of Filing: 18-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-06-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 54 OF 2016in CC/409/2015Animesh Sharma Vs Motorola Mobility India Pvt. Ltd. and othersBEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Complainant in person.None fo...
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:45/2016Date of Institution:18.01.2016Date of Decision:06.05.2016 Mr.Navneet Verma s/o Late Shri Shameshwar Dass Verma r/o H.No.138, CHB Flats, Sector 55, Chandigarh. ... Complainant.VersusManager...
Case Number: 45
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Motorola in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Motorola ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Motorola under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.