
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Gourav Juneja
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.Complaint no. 69 of 2017Date of instt.: 16.02.2017Date of decision 26.04.2017Gourav Juneja S/o Amrit Lal Juneja resident of H.No. 455-A/10, New Ashoka Colony Kaithal. …..Complainant Versus1. Motorola Mobility Ind...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2017
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
723/16 D.O.O- 21.04.2017Present :- None for complainant. Counsel for OP. Complaint passed over several times since morning. But none put in appearance on behalf of complainant. It is already 02.40 P.M. No further wait is justified and possible. Complainant was not present on pr...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2017
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/17/561. Aby Reji ChemmathuTvpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MotorolaTvpm............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Shri P.Sudhir PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. R.Sathi MEMBERHON'B...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2017
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRURJUDICIAL COURT COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, SANGRUR (148001)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/641/20161. Sahil ChauhanSahil Chauhan aged 21 years son of Satwinder Chauhan, resisdent of H.No. 361, Magzine Street- Sangrur, Punjab...........Compla...
Case Number: 641
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Rahul Lakra
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No. : CC/127 OF 2017Instituted on : 15.03.2017Date of order : 16.03.2017Abhimanyu Lakra s/o Sh. Subhash Lakra, H.No. 1068/23, Aggarwal gali, gur mandi, Sonepat. …ComplainantVersusDheeraj, Motorola S...
Case Number: 127
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Dated :15/03/2017ORDER The case has been taken up today on the application of the complainant/applicant. The complainant has appended a note on the complaint itself that he withdrew his case. In view of the statement of complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certi...
Case Number: 238
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2017
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
D.O.O- 10.03.2017Present :- None. Complaint passed over several times since morning. But none put in appearance on behalf of parties. It is already 03.30 P.M. No further wait is justified and possible. Complainant was not present on previous date for hearing also. It seems th...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-03-2017
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate in person
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/36/20171. Jaivir SinghSon of Birbal Vpo Patwan Loharu ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MotorolaMoto Sevice Record Near Chhotu Ram Chowk Rohtak.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajesh Jindal PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Anamika Gupta MEMB...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 28-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2017
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/16/326( Date of Filing : 10 Jun 2016 )1. ANASWAR G11/164A(13/426),CHINMAYAM EDAYILE VEEDU, NETTORE,MARADU PANCHAYATH, KOCHI-682040...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. MOTOROLA INDIA PVT.LTDREP. BY ITS MA...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 10-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2018
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/15/3841. Jacob V ThomasDawn villa.KVRA 28/ B,KK Rioad,Karivattom PO,TVpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Motorolasector -14,Gurgoan,HARIYANA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HO...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Motorola in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Motorola ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Motorola under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.