Jain Irrigation
Latest Judgments
Total 88 Consumer Court Cases Against Jain Irrigation.
Jain Irrigation System Ltd V/S Mangaldas Sitaram Sapkale
Court Name: Jalgaon
Appelant Advocate Adv.Shradhaya Kabra
Respondant Advocate
final order District Consumer Redressal Forum,JalgaonComplaint Case No. CC/11/641. Mangaldas Sitaram SapkaleJalgaonMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Jain Irrigation System LtdJalgaonJalgaonMaharashtra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Vinayak R.Londhe PRESIDEN...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2015
M/s Jain Irrigation Systims Ltd through Manager V/S Mr Anil Pandarinath Garud
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate Kiran S Ghone
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-02-2016
M/S Jain Irrigation System V/S Amar Singh
Court Name: Una
Appelant Advocate Sh.Vineet Kaundal
Respondant Advocate Sh. V.S.Chandel
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-07-2015
Jain Irrigation System Ltd. & Anr. V/S Sh. Mahesh Sharma.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Shashi Bhushan.
Respondant Advocate Mr. Swaran Sharma.
Case Number: 358
|
Date of Filing: 14-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2015
Sh. Karam Chand. V/S Jain Irrigation System Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Swaran Sharma.
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 411
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2015
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. V/S JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEMS LTD.
United India Insurance Jain Irrigation
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. S. NARAIN & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 07/01/2013 in Complaint No. 08/2010 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEMS LTD.THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT, DONGARMAL INDERCHAND DESARADA, JAIN FOOD...
Case Number: 126
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 19-11-2014
Jain irrigation system Pvt.ltd. 2. Amit Spear V/S Pandutang Bhaurao Godage
Court Name: Solapur
Appelant Advocate Anpat
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solapur.Behind District Treasury Office, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/11/3021. Pandutang Bhaurao GodageR/o At&po Ropale Tal. Madha SolapurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Jain irrigation system Pvt.ltd. 2. Amit SpearAt&Banb...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
VIJAYKUMAR LIMBAJI DISALE V/S M/S JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEM LTD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P G DESHPANDE
Respondant Advocate .
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/350(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/03/2011 in Case No. 571/09 of District Solapur)1. M/S JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEM LTDREGG OFFICE PLASTICS PARK BAMBHORI TAL DHARANGAON THROUGH AUT...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SHRIHARI BHAGAWAN KAPSE V/S M/S JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEM LTD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P G DESHPANDE
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/350(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/03/2011 in Case No. 571/09 of District Solapur)1. M/S JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEM LTDREGG OFFICE PLASTICS PARK BAMBHORI TAL DHARANGAON THROUGH AUT...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
BALASAHEB GORAKH MUNDFANE V/S M/S JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEM LTD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P G DESHPANDE
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/352(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/01/2011 in Case No. 271/2009 of District Solapur)1. M/S JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEM LTDREGG OFFICE PLASTICS PARK BAMBHORI TAL DHARANGAON THROUGH A...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Jain Irrigation in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Jain Irrigation ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Jain Irrigation under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.