company-name-logo

Jain Irrigation

Latest Judgments

Total 88 Consumer Court Cases Against Jain Irrigation.

Andhra Pradesh

1. M/s. Jain Irrigation System (P) ltd., through its, Chief Excetive Officer, V/S T. Nagaiah, S/o. T. Tarsimulu, Aged about 59 Years,

Jain Irrigation  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. V. Gouri Sankara Rao

Respondant Advocate M/s. Ravi Sankar Jandhyala ,M/s M. Sasikala Devi - OP1

Complaint Case No. CC/4/20041. T. Nagaiah, S/o. T. Tarsimulu, Aged about 59 Years,Resident of Bellampalli, Adilabad District.2. M/s. Pioneer Drip Systems Ltd- OP2hyderabadHyderabad...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. M/s. Jain Irrigation System (P) ltd., through its, Chief Exceti...

Case Number: 4

|

Date of Filing: 19-01-2004

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

M/S. JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEMS LTD. V/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.

United India Insurance   Jain Irrigation  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK KUMAR

Respondant Advocate M/S. S. NARAIN & CO.

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3032 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 20/03/2013 in Appeal No. 35/2011 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/5235/20131. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.THROUGH ITS DULY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY, MANA...

Case Number: 3032

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 27-11-2013

NCDRC

M/S. JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEMS LTD. V/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.

United India Insurance   Jain Irrigation  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2345 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 02/05/2013 in Appeal No. 35/2011 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/3895/2013,IA/3896/20131. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.REGISTERED OFFICE AT. DELHI RE...

Case Number: 2345

|

Date of Filing: 12-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 07-08-2013

Circuit Bench Aurangabad

Director/Manager, Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd. V/S Yogesh Prabhakar Choudhary

Jain Irrigation  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate V.Y.Gangtira

Respondant Advocate S.V.Choudhary

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. A/137/2007(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/01/2007 in Case No. 26/06 of District Nandurbar )1. Yogesh Prabhakar ChoudharyR/o.Near Kalpana Talkies,Taloda,Dist.Nandurbar.Nandur...

Case Number: 137

|

Date of Filing: 26-02-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

T. NAGAIAH AND ORS. V/S M/S. JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEMS PVT LTD.

Jain Irrigation  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. S. NARAIN AND CO.

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 392 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 13/03/2007 in Complaint No. 4/2004 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. M/S. JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEMS PVT LTD.BHANHERI JALGAON MAHARASHTRA MAHARASHTRA...........Appellant(s...

Case Number: 392

|

Date of Filing: 09-07-2007

|

Date of Upload: 17-10-2012

NCDRC

PARVATI SHANKAR JADHAV & ANR. V/S JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEMS LTD.

Jain Irrigation  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. S. NARAIN & CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3122 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 06/03/2011 in Appeal No. 325/2011 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. JAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEMS LTD.A Company Registerd Under the Companies Act 1956 Having Its Regi...

Case Number: 3122

|

Date of Filing: 23-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 12-09-2012

Karnataka

Case Number: 34

|

Date of Filing: 18-07-1996

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2021

Karnataka

Case Number: 33

|

Date of Filing: 20-08-1996

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Jain Irrigation in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Jain Irrigation ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Jain Irrigation under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.