
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Vaneesh Khanna
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:675 of 2015Date of Institution:06.10.2015Date of Decision:30.09.2016Harjit Singh Sahdra s/o Sh. Parkash Singh, resident of House No.2214/1, Sector 45-C, Chandigarh.…..Complainant ...
Case Number: 675
|
Date of Filing: 06-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 99
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-10-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Harmandeep Sullar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:162 of 2016Date of Institution:25.04.2016Date of Decision:22.09.2016Balraj Singh Randhawa having his place of residence at House No.55, Akal Ashram Colony, Opp. Eye Hospital, Sector 77, Mohali, India....
Case Number: 162
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sobti, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:169 of 2016Date of Institution:28.04.2016Date of Decision:22.09.2016Gurmail Singh S/o Sh. Joginder Singh, r/o House No.726, Sector 2, Panchkula 134109.……ComplainantV e r s u sM/s Emaar M...
Case Number: 169
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/543/2014Date of Institution:13/08/2014Date of Decision:21/09/2016Kabir Khanna s/o Sh. Vishwa Bandhu Khanna, resident of House No.1747, Sector 4, Panchkula.…..ComplainantV E R S U S1. M/s...
Case Number: 543
|
Date of Filing: 13-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mukand Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this compliant with liberty to file the same before the appropriate Commission. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Office is directed to prepare one photostat copy of t...
Case Number: 600
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUMIT K. BATRA
Respondant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY & BAKHSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 70 OF 20151. AASHISH OBERAIHouse No. 154, Sector 15-A, Noida,U.P. - 201 301...........Complainant(s)Versus1. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITEDECE House, 28, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi - 110 001............Opp.Pa...
Case Number: 70
|
Date of Filing: 29-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipin Mahajan
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:111 of 2016Date of Institution:21.03.2016Date of Decision:12.09.2016Gagan Kapoor son of Sh. S.S.Kapoor, resident of H.No.1690, Sector 34-D, Chandigarh.Sabyasachi Chakraborty s/o D.K.Chakraborty, resid...
Case Number: 111
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:188 of 2016Date of Institution:04.05.2016Date of Decision:12.09.2016Ms. Remy Kakkar wife of Capt. Naresh Kumar Kakkar aged 52 years.Capt. Naresh Kumar Kakkar son of Late Sh. Rajendra Prakash, aged 55 ...
Case Number: 188
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NP Sharma & Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the parties are in agreement that the matter has amicably been settled. Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, on getting instructions from Sh. Gurdeep Singh, Senior Manager (legal) of the Opposite Parties states that an amount of Rs.39,09,851/- shall be returned to the compla...
Case Number: 255
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.