
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:160 of 2016Date of Institution:22.04.2016Date of Decision:07.09.2016Mr.Inderjit Verma.Mr.Manoj Verma.Mr.Harish Verma.All sons of Sh.Manohar Lal Verma and residents of House No.719, Sector 4, Panchkula...
Case Number: 160
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Gaurav Chopra, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.151 of 2016Date of Institution20.04.2016Date of Decision06.09.2016Mrs. Kamlesh Gomber w/o Dr. K. L. Gomber resident of H.No.983, Sector 7, Urban Estate, Ambala City, Haryana. .…C...
Case Number: 151
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
After arguing very vigorously for some time, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint with a view to avail any other appropriate remedy in law. In view of above, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties f...
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SandeepBhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
After arguing very vigorously for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with a view to avail any other appropriate remedy in law. In view of above, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties fr...
Case Number: 40
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
After arguing very vigorously for some time, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with a view to avail any other appropriate remedy in law. In view of above, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties fr...
Case Number: 41
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R. ANAND PADMANABHAN
Respondant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY & BAKHSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1005 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 02/11/2015 in Appeal No. 1296/2014 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUKHRAJDEEP SINGH & ANR.S/O SH. HARMINDER SINGH SODHI R/O NEAR PWD REST HOUSE G.T. ROAD,MOGADIS...
Case Number: 1005
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R. ANAND PADMANABHAN
Respondant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY & BAKHSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1005 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 02/11/2015 in Appeal No. 1296/2014 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUKHRAJDEEP SINGH & ANR.S/O SH. HARMINDER SINGH SODHI R/O NEAR PWD REST HOUSE G.T. ROAD,MOGADIS...
Case Number: 535
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R. ANAND PADMANABHAN
Respondant Advocate M/S. CHAMBERS OF JAITLEY & BAKHSHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1005 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 02/11/2015 in Appeal No. 1296/2014 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUKHRAJDEEP SINGH & ANR.S/O SH. HARMINDER SINGH SODHI R/O NEAR PWD REST HOUSE G.T. ROAD,MOGADIS...
Case Number: 536
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-09-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Capt Arun Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
After arguing for some time, Counsel for the Decree Holders/complainants wishes to withdraw this Execution Application. Ordered accordingly. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties free of charge...
Case Number: 96
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1292 OF 20161. TARANJIT KAUR & ANR.W/O. SH. HARBHAJAN SING, R/O. KP-321, MAURYA ENCLAVE, PITAM PURA, NEW DELHI-110034.NEW DELHI-1100342. MR. BHUPINDER SINGH.R/O. KP-321, MAURYA ENCLAVE, PITAM PURA, NEW DEL...
Case Number: 1292
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-09-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.