company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow Development Authority V/S Smt. Sheela Dwivedi

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ramesh Kumar Dwivedi

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/129/2021( Date of Filing : 25 Feb 2021 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/02/2021 in Case No. C/2013/924 of District Lucknow-II)1. Smt. Sheela Dwivedi...

Case Number: 129

|

Date of Filing: 25-02-2021

|

Date of Upload: 25-03-2021

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Lajpat Rai Chuchra

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Lajpat Rai Chuchra

Respondant Advocate Rishi Ram Sharma

BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Execution Application No.74 of 2021 Date of instt. 08.07.2019 Date of Decision 18.03.2021Lajpat Rai Chuchra (Ex-Serviceman) son of Shri Ladha Ram Chuchra, resident of H.No.963, Sector-6, Urban Estat...

Case Number: 74

|

Date of Filing: 08-07-2019

|

Date of Upload: 24-03-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Kanpur Development Authority V/S Vishram Singh

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/184/2021( Date of Filing : 15 Mar 2021 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/02/2021 in Case No. MA/2021/22 of District Kanpur Nagar)1. Vishram Singh125 ...

Case Number: 184

|

Date of Filing: 15-03-2021

|

Date of Upload: 19-03-2021

NCDRC

KANCHAN KANWAR & ANR. V/S JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANISH MAHESHWARI

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 270 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 15/09/2020 in Appeal No. 292/2020 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. KANCHAN KANWAR & ANR............R...

Case Number: 270

|

Date of Filing: 05-03-2021

|

Date of Upload: 31-03-2021

NCDRC

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S VINIT JAIN

Development Authority   Jaipur Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA NATH PAREEK

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 6 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 19/11/2020 in Appeal No. 346/2020 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. VINIT JAIN...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Respondent(s) ...

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 04-01-2021

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2021

NCDRC

SANDEEP GANDOTRA V/S DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi Development Authority   Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MR. GAGAN GUPTA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 480 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/04/2013 in Complaint No. 230/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS DIRECTOR (H-I), VIKAS SADAN, INA, NEW DELHI...........Appella...

Case Number: 480

|

Date of Filing: 26-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2021

NCDRC

HARPREET KAUR DHILLON & ANR. V/S GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA) & ANR.

Development Authority   Greater Mohali Area Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ZEHRA KHAN

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 888 OF 2020(Against the Order dated 14/11/2018 in Complaint No. 1042/2017 of the State Commission Punjab)1. GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA) & ANR............Appellant(s)Versus1. HARPREET K...

Case Number: 888

|

Date of Filing: 06-11-2020

|

Date of Upload: 15-03-2021

Punjab

The Jalandhar Development Authority V/S Krishan aged 76 years wife of sh. Tarlok Singh

Development Authority   Jalandhar Development Authority  

Court Name: Jalandhar

Appelant Advocate Sh. APS Pathania

Respondant Advocate

Distt Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionLadowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/74/2021( Date of Filing : 15 Feb 2021 )1. Krishan aged 76 years wife of sh. Tarlok SinghR/o 340, Ekroop Avenue, Majitha Roa...

Case Number: 74

|

Date of Filing: 15-02-2021

|

Date of Upload: 07-03-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Dinesh Kumar Srivastava V/S Allahabad Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Deepak Mehrotra

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2000/545( Date of Filing : 26 Feb 2000 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/01/2000 in Case No. C/1292/1995 of District Allahabad)1. Allahabad Developme...

Case Number: 2000

|

Date of Filing: 26-02-2000

|

Date of Upload: 09-03-2021

Orissa

Cuttack Development Authority V/S Dr Raghunath Behura

Development Authority  

Court Name: Cuttak

Appelant Advocate N B Dass

Respondant Advocate

IN THE COURT OF THE DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,CUTTACK. C.C.No.74/2019Dr. Raghunath Behura,S/O:Late Narayan Chandra Behura,A/41,Sector-7,C.D.A,P.O:Abhinav Bidanasi,P.S:Markatnagar,Cuttack-753014. … Complainant.Vrs.Chairman,Cuttack Development Authority,P....

Case Number: 74

|

Date of Filing: 12-07-2019

|

Date of Upload: 03-03-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.