company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Chandigarh

Late Sh. Jatinder Kumar V/S Haryana Urban Development Authority

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHMiscellaneous Application No.In A/RBT/1134/2008:975 of 2019Date of Institution:19.11.2019Date of Decision:07.09.2021Haryana Urban Development Authority, Now HSVP, Plot No.C-3, HUDA Complex, Sector-6, Panchkula, PIN: 134...

Case Number: 975

|

Date of Filing: 19-11-2019

|

Date of Upload: 09-09-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Mr. Wilson Paulose K.M. V/S Yamuna Expressway Industrial DEvelopment Authority

Development Authority   Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Prashant Kumar & Fuhar Gput

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/40/2020( Date of Filing : 10 Jan 2020 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/07/2019 in Case No. C/331/2014 of District Gautam Buddha Nagar)1. Yamuna Expr...

Case Number: 40

|

Date of Filing: 10-01-2020

|

Date of Upload: 09-09-2021

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S NAND KISHORE

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. SHRUTI DUTT

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 904 OF 2020(Against the Order dated 25/03/2019 in Complaint No. 84/2018 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NAND KISHOREH/6, SUSHILA, R/O. 3/272, VISHAL KHAND GOMTI NAGAR LUCKNOW UTTAR PRADESH............

Case Number: 904

|

Date of Filing: 17-11-2020

|

Date of Upload: 08-09-2021

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S SUSHILA

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. SHRUTI DUTT & MS. PUSHPILA BISHT

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 905 OF 2020(Against the Order dated 25/03/2019 in Complaint No. 85/2018 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SUSHILA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS............Res...

Case Number: 905

|

Date of Filing: 17-11-2020

|

Date of Upload: 08-09-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Dr. Smt. Vibha Sareen V/S Mathura vrindavan development authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate N.C. Upadhya

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/79/2021( Date of Filing : 01 Sep 2021 )InFirst Appeal No. A/1747/20181. Mathura vrindavan development authorityMathura...........App...

Case Number: 79

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2021

|

Date of Upload: 06-09-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Pramod Tyagi V/S Meerut Development Authority

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ram Raj

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2008/461( Date of Filing : 03 Mar 2008 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Meerut Development Authoritya.........

Case Number: 2008

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2008

|

Date of Upload: 16-09-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Vinod Kumar Tyagi V/S Meerut Development Authority

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ram Raj

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2008/461( Date of Filing : 03 Mar 2008 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Meerut Development Authoritya.........

Case Number: 2008

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2008

|

Date of Upload: 16-09-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Umesh Kumar Tyagi V/S Meerut Development Authority

Development Authority   Meerut Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ram Raj

Respondant Advocate Vikas Agrawal

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2008/461( Date of Filing : 03 Mar 2008 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Meerut Development Authoritya.........

Case Number: 2008

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2008

|

Date of Upload: 16-09-2021

Karnataka

Mysore Urban Development Authority V/S Mrs Nagamma.G

Development Authority   Mysore Urban Development Authority  

Court Name: Mysore

Appelant Advocate Dinesh Solanki

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION MYSURUNo.1542 F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara,Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysuru-570023Complaint Case No. CC/10/2020( Date of Filing : 04 Jan 2020 )1. Mrs Nagamma.G W/o Chikkanna ...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 04-01-2020

|

Date of Upload: 30-08-2021

NCDRC

DEV RAJ V/S PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( P.U.D.A.)

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHUBHAM BHALLA, MR. YAJUR BHALLA & MR. DEEPAK SAMOTA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 517 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 11/03/2019 in Complaint No. 905/2018 of the State Commission Punjab)1. PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( P.U.D.A.)...........Appellant(s)Versus1. DEV RAJ......

Case Number: 517

|

Date of Filing: 11-08-2021

|

Date of Upload: 27-09-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.