company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Uttar Pradesh

YAMUNA EXPRESSWAY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S GROVER IMPEX PVT.LTD.

Development Authority   Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar

Appelant Advocate AMITAVA PODDAR & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate

FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Miscellaneous Application No. MA/76/2021( Date of Filing : 09 Feb 2021 )In1. GROVER IMPEX PVT.LTD.115, TRANSPORT CENTRE, NEW ROHTAK ROAD, PUNJABI BAGH, NEW DELHI 110035,...........Appellant...

Case Number: 76

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-2021

|

Date of Upload: 19-02-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow Development Authority V/S Rakesh Singh

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sarvesh Kumar Sharma

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/14/2020( Date of Filing : 24 Jan 2020 )1. Rakesh SinghS/O Awadhesh Singh R/O Balrampur Chini Mill Ltd Unit PO Babhanan Gonda...........Complain...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 24-01-2020

|

Date of Upload: 22-06-2021

Madhya Pradesh

ANURAG SHAH V/S JABALPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SH.ASADULLAH KHAN

Respondant Advocate

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPALREVIEW APPLICATION NO. 02 OF 2021O R D E R S H E E TDATE OF ORDERORDER WITH SIGNATUREORDER OF THE REGISTRAR ON OFFICE NOTING08.01.2021 THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING Shri Asad Ullah Khan, learned counsel for t...

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 18-01-2021

|

Date of Upload: 02-02-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Manoj Kumar Jain

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority   Manoj  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M H Khan

Respondant Advocate Sarvesh Kumar Sharma

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2001/1889( Date of Filing : 29 Aug 2001 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/10/2000 in Case No. C/541/1993 of District Ghaziabad)1. Manoj Kumar Jaina.....

Case Number: 2001

|

Date of Filing: 29-08-2001

|

Date of Upload: 29-01-2021

NCDRC

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PANKAJ KUMAR SHARMA

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate MR. SHANTANU KRISHNA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2192 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 10/02/2014 in Appeal No. 2380/2012 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. PANKAJ KUMAR SHARMAS/O SH.OM PRAKASH SHARMA, R/O 5573,SHORA KOTHI, PAHARGANJ,NEW DELHI -...

Case Number: 2192

|

Date of Filing: 13-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 23-01-2021

Uttar Pradesh

JHANSI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DR. DEENA NATH

Development Authority  

Court Name: Jhansi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/11/2018( Date of Filing : 10 Jan 2018 )1. DR. DEENA NATHH-31 SARANDHRA NAGAR HANSARI JHANSIJHANSIUTTAR PRADESH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. JHANSI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYCOMMISSIONERY CAMPUS JHANSIJHANSIUTTAR PRADESH............Opp.Party(s)...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 10-01-2018

|

Date of Upload: 14-07-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Gyan Niketan School V/S Kanpur Development Authority

Development Authority   School   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arvind Kumar & Manoj Kumar

Respondant Advocate Satya Prakash Pandey, Harpreet Singh, Anand Bhargav

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/347/2020( Date of Filing : 07 Oct 2020 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/10/2019 in Case No. C/227/2016 of District Kanpur Nagar)1. Kanpur Developmen...

Case Number: 347

|

Date of Filing: 07-10-2020

|

Date of Upload: 10-02-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Suresh Kumar Chandravanshi V/S Moradabad Development Authority

Development Authority   Suresh  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sharad Tewari & Sarvesh Kumar Sharma

Respondant Advocate Alok Sinha

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2000/2942( Date of Filing : 08 Dec 2000 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/10/2000 in Case No. C/813/1998 of District Muradabad-II)1. Moradabad Develo...

Case Number: 2000

|

Date of Filing: 08-12-2000

|

Date of Upload: 15-01-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority V/S Prem Chandra Shamra

Development Authority   Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sanjay Kumar Verma

Respondant Advocate Rajesh Chadha

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. R/2012/46( Date of Filing : 21 Mar 2012 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/02/2012 in Case No. E/2009/66 of District Gautam Buddha Nagar)1. Prem Ch...

Case Number: 2012

|

Date of Filing: 21-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 21-01-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority V/S Manoj Kumar

Development Authority   Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority   Manoj  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Rahul Singh & Ranjeet Pandey

Respondant Advocate Prashant Kumar & Kushagra Dikshit

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/208/2018( Date of Filing : 08 Jun 2018 )1. Manoj KumarR/O G-31 First Floor Flat No. 1 Aruna Park Shakarpur Delhi 110092...........Complainant(s...

Case Number: 208

|

Date of Filing: 08-06-2018

|

Date of Upload: 12-01-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.