company-name-logo

Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.

Uttar Pradesh

Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Dheeraj Madan

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Smt. Suchita Singh

Respondant Advocate Arvind Kumar

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/258/2019( Date of Filing : 29 Aug 2019 )1. Dheeraj MadanR/o 3 Hari Niketan West Enclave Pitampura New Delhi 110034...........Complainant(s)Vers...

Case Number: 258

|

Date of Filing: 29-08-2019

|

Date of Upload: 01-12-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Ghaziabad Development Authority V/S Preeti Nijhawan

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Smt. Suchita Singh

Respondant Advocate Arvind Kumar

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/259/2019( Date of Filing : 29 Aug 2019 )1. Preeti NijhawanR/O 3 Haari Niketan West Enclave Pitampura New Delhi 110034 ...........Complainant(s)...

Case Number: 259

|

Date of Filing: 29-08-2019

|

Date of Upload: 03-12-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Kanchan Lata V/S Gorakhpur Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Atul Kumar Singh

Respondant Advocate Alok Ranjan

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2013/370( Date of Filing : 27 Feb 2013 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Gorakhpur Development Authoritya......

Case Number: 2013

|

Date of Filing: 27-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 29-09-2021

NCDRC

GREATER NOIDA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PARUL SHALI

Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. ANUSHREE NARAIN & MR. ADITYA NARAIN

Respondant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA KUMAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 1933 OF 20161. PARUL SHALIA-8, PAMPOSH ENCLAVE, GREATER KAILASH, PART-I, NEW DELHI-110048............Complainant(s)Versus1. GREATER NOIDA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY#169, CHITVAN ESTATE, SECTOR GAMMA-II, UTTAR P...

Case Number: 1933

|

Date of Filing: 25-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 21-09-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Pramod Kumar Agarwal V/S Bareilly Development Authority

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate D Mehrotra, Sri V.P. Srivastava

Respondant Advocate Sanjay Saxena, Shri. Bhavana Gupta

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. R/2009/30( Date of Filing : 25 Feb 2009 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Bareilly Development Authoritya........

Case Number: 2009

|

Date of Filing: 25-02-2009

|

Date of Upload: 26-10-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Suresh Kumar V/S Ghaziabad Development Authority

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority   Suresh  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Arvind Kumar

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1997/932( Date of Filing : 16 Jun 1997 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/05/1997 in Case No. C/476/1995 of District Ghaziabad)1. Ghaziabad Developmen...

Case Number: 1997

|

Date of Filing: 16-06-1997

|

Date of Upload: 29-11-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Kanpur Development Authority V/S Vishram Singh

Development Authority   Kanpur Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/442/2021( Date of Filing : 09 Sep 2021 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/07/2021 in Case No. MA/2021/43 of District Kanpur Nagar)1. Vishram SinghS/o ...

Case Number: 442

|

Date of Filing: 09-09-2021

|

Date of Upload: 15-09-2021

Uttar Pradesh

R K Tewari V/S Ghaziabad Development Authority

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ram Raj & Sarvesh Kumar Sharma

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. R/2003/106( Date of Filing : 07 Jul 2003 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. C/1227/1994 of District Ghaziabad)1. Ghaziabad Development Authorit...

Case Number: 2003

|

Date of Filing: 07-07-2003

|

Date of Upload: 13-09-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Anil Kumar Hajela V/S Ghaziabad Development Authority

Development Authority   Ghaziabad Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ram Raj

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. R/2003/132( Date of Filing : 24 Jul 2003 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. C/1994/520 of District Ghaziabad)1. Ghaziabad Development Authority...

Case Number: 2003

|

Date of Filing: 24-07-2003

|

Date of Upload: 13-09-2021

Uttar Pradesh

Allahabad Development Authority V/S Siya Ram Lalta Prasad

Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Anupam Dwivedi & Rao Narendra Singh

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2000/905( Date of Filing : 13 Apr 2000 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/12/1999 in Case No. C/1361/1995 of District Allahabad)1. Siya Ram Lalta Pras...

Case Number: 2000

|

Date of Filing: 13-04-2000

|

Date of Upload: 13-09-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.