Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/363/2017Date of Institution:27/04/2017Date of Decision:08/12/2017Jatinder Singh r/o H.No.482, Hallo Majra, Near Hanuman Mandir, Chandigarh.…..ComplainantV E R S U S1. Xiaomi India, c/o I...
Case Number: 363
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-01-2018
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/16/2017Date of Institution:06/01/2017Date of Decision:08/12/2017Sukhwinder Singh son of Sh. Hazura Singh, resident of House No. 554/4, Ward No.11, M.C. Colony, Mundi Kharar, S.A.S. Naga...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-01-2018
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Aman Priye Jain
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/704/2016Date of Institution:29/08/2016Date of Decision:05/12/20171. Maharaj Gajanand s/o Gopi Ram, H.No.2287, Top Floor, Sector 44-C, Chandigarh.2. Nisha Bhagt, H.No.23, Ram Vihar, Baltana, Moh...
Case Number: 704
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-01-2018
Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/573/20161. Amarjeet SinghS/o Sh. Gurdev Singh, R/o Village Jandpur, Tehsil Kharar, Distt Mohali, Punjab............Complainant(s)Versus1. Xiaomi India Pvt. Ltd.5th Floor, Delta Blk, Embassy Tech Sq, Kadubeesanahalli Marathahalli-Sarjapur Oute...
Case Number: 573
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2017
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Sh.Appolojit Singh Kamalpur
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 342 Instituted on: 17.07.2017 Decided on: 22.11.2017Chirag Singla son of Sh. Prem Deep, resident of Street No.3, Agar Nagar, Sangrur. …Complainant Versus1. Xiomi India C/o Ikeva Business Centre, 8th Floor, ...
Case Number: 342
|
Date of Filing: 17-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-12-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/759/2016Date of Institution:08/09/2016Date of Decision:13/11/2017Puneet Mahajan son of Shri Subhash Mahajan, resident of House No.2363, Sector 40-C, Chandigarh 160036.…..ComplainantV E R...
Case Number: 759
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Manoj Kumar Rohilla Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:388/2017Date of Institution:02.05.2017Date of Decision:13/11/2017 Vikas Kundu s/o Sh.Balbir Singh r/o Village Kaith, Post Office Shahpur, District Panipat, Haryana. ... Complainant.VersusXiaomi In...
Case Number: 388
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2017
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL FORUM-III (WEST)C-BLOCK, COMMUNITY CENTRE,PANKHA ROAD, JANAK PURI, NEW DELHIComplaint Case No. CC/15/6981. RIZWAN AHAMEDDELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. XIAOMI COMMUNICATIONDELHI............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Sh. R.S.BANGRI PRESIDENT...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-10-2017
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Sh. Tarun Goyal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRURJUDICIAL COURT COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, SANGRUR (148001)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/173/20171. Vikas GoyalVikas Goyal S/o NAnu Ram R/o Ward no. 1, Grid colony, Moonak, Tehsil Moonak, Distt. Sangrur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Xia...
Case Number: 173
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. A/202/2017(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/07/2017 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/777/2016 of District DF-II)1. Amandeep SinghChandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Xiaomi Exclusive Chandigarh.Chandigarh...
Case Number: 202
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-08-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Xiaomi in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Xiaomi ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Xiaomi under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.