company-name-logo

Mi


Latest Judgments

Total 116 Consumer Court Cases Against Mi.

Rajasthan

Real mi mobile V/S Sudarshan soni

Mobile   Mi  

Court Name: Sawai Madhopur

Appelant Advocate Govind Dixit

Respondant Advocate Tapesh Jain

Case Number: 68

|

Date of Filing: 24-02-2023

|

Date of Upload: 27-10-2023

Uttarakhand

MI Store Universal Mobilinks & others V/S Shri Harpal Singh

Mi  

Court Name: Udham Singh Nagar

Appelant Advocate Mr. Hem Chandra

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 22-01-2020

|

Date of Upload: 19-10-2023

Kerala

Mi Store, Kalpeta, Near Old Bus Stand, Kalpetta Post, Vythiri Taluk, Rep by Its Manager V/S Tinto.K. V, S/o. Varghese, Kulungattil House, Thrikkaipatta Post, Vythiri Taluk

Mi  

Court Name: Wayanad

Appelant Advocate Adv. K. N. Abdul Basheer

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONCIVIL STATION ,KALPETTAWAYANAD-673122PHONE 04936-202755Complaint Case No. CC/38/2023( Date of Filing : 22 Feb 2023 )1. Tinto.K. V, S/o. Varghese, Kulungattil House, Thrikkaipatta Post, Vythiri TalukWayanadWayanadKerala...........Complainant(s...

Case Number: 38

|

Date of Filing: 22-02-2023

|

Date of Upload: 06-10-2023

Himachal Pradesh

MI Mobile V/S Aditi Sharma

Mobile   Mi  

Court Name: Kangra

Appelant Advocate Complainant in Person

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 128

|

Date of Filing: 06-05-2023

|

Date of Upload: 21-08-2023

Gujarat

(1) LUV Phones ( MI Exclusive Store ) (2) MI Service Center (3) MI Head Office ( Xiomi ) Xiomi Techn V/S Panchal Nileshkumar Jyantilal.

Mi   Xiomi  

Court Name: Mahesana

Appelant Advocate Y.A.Chaudhary / S.K.Nayak

Respondant Advocate (1) N.J.Patel (2) Ex Parte (3) Ex Parte

Case Number: 81

|

Date of Filing: 10-03-2023

|

Date of Upload: 09-08-2023

Maharashtra

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 12-10-2022

|

Date of Upload: 24-07-2023

Kerala

MI SERVICE CENTRE V/S KARUNAKARAN KP

Mi  

Court Name: Malappuram

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL MALAPPURAMComplaint Case No. CC/351/2022( Date of Filing : 17 Sep 2022 )1. KARUNAKARAN KPKARMANJALI PALOOR PULAMANTHOLE 679323...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MI SERVICE CENTREGLOBAL INFOCOM MA COMPLEX ANNIE HALL ROAD CALICUT 6730022. XIAOMI ...

Case Number: 351

|

Date of Filing: 17-09-2022

|

Date of Upload: 11-09-2023

Delhi

MI SERVICE CENTRE V/S ARUN KUMAR BANSAL

Mi  

Court Name: North West

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Complaint Case No. CC/422/2020( Date of Filing : 24 Nov 2020 )1. ARUN KUMAR BANSALS/O SH. BANWARI LAL R/O H.NO.GH-1/952,CREATIVE HEIGHTS,SEC-29,ROHIN...

Case Number: 422

|

Date of Filing: 24-11-2020

|

Date of Upload: 17-04-2023

Kerala

MI STORE V/S ANANDAN PILLAI

Mi  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAMPRESENT SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN : PRESIDENT SMT.PREETHA.G.NAIR : MEMBER SRI.VIJU.V.R. : MEMBERCC.NO.335/2022 (Filed on : 23/08/2022)ORDER DATED : 25/02/2023COMPLAINANTAnandan A Pillai,Villa 6 , L...

Case Number: 335

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2022

|

Date of Upload: 13-04-2023

Tamil Nadu

1.Thiru.Shravan Bohra at Sarvan kumar Bohra, S/o. Gordhan Lal Bohra, Vakrangee Hard wards, No.56, Mi V/S M/s.National Insurance Co Ltd, Represented by its Manager, City Branch III, 1670, Trichy Raod, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore 641 001.

National Insurance   Mi  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s.Nageswaran and Narichania

Respondant Advocate -

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAIBEFORE : Hon’ble Thiru Justice R. SUBBIAH PRESIDENTThiru R VENKATESAPERUMAL MEMBERF.A.NO.206/2019(Against order in CC.NO.190/2016 on the file of the DCDRC, Coimbatore) DATED THIS THE 14th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 M/s...

Case Number: 206

|

Date of Filing: 26-08-2019

|

Date of Upload: 10-07-2023

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mi in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mi ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Mi under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.