
Court Name: Central Mumbai
Appelant Advocate S S Borkar
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd Floor, General Nagesh Marg, Near Mahatma Gandhi HospitalParel, Mumbai-400 012 Phone No. 022-2417 1360Website- www.confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/17/152( Date of Filing : 21 Jul 2017 )1. Neelesh...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2019
Court Name: Alappuzha
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ALAPPUZHAPazhaveedu P.O., AlappuzhaComplaint Case No. CC/185/2018( Date of Filing : 05 Jul 2018 )1. Sri. Harisankar. T.P.Thayappally, PollethaiP.O., kalavoor, Alappuzha-688522AlappuzhaKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Managing D...
Case Number: 185
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2019
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate Puja Beriwal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/514/2018( Date of Filing : 11 Dec 2018 )1. Rajendra Sethia7A, Queens Park, Kolkata-700019 and Western Carriers India Ltd., 206, Central...
Case Number: 514
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Tangri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is apparently clear from the record that the respondent/opposite party was deficient in providing service. At this stage, the matter has been settled between the parties. Counsel for the respondent has offered for payment a demand draft bearing No.304681 dated 18.12.2018 in th...
Case Number: 159
|
Date of Filing: 05-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision:07.12.2018First Appeal No.401/2015(Arising out of the order dated 13.07.2015 passed in Complaint Case No. 90/2015 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (VI...
Case Number: 401
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHAppeal No.325 of 2018Date of Institution31.10.2018Date of Decision02.11.2018Sh.Ashok Kumar s/o Sh.Harmal Singh, R/o H.No.1420, Vikas Nagar, Mauli Jagran, Chandigarh. …..Appellant/Complainant. VersusVod...
Case Number: 325
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2018
|
Date of Upload: 21-12-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:183 of 2018Date of Institution:22.06.2018Date of Decision:25.10.2018Sahil Thakur, Advocate, Chamber No.108-A, District Courts, Sector 43, Chandigarh.…….Appellant.VersusVodafone Mobile Services L...
Case Number: 183
|
Date of Filing: 22-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-10-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vishal Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:124 of 2018Date of Institution:16.05.2018Date of Decision:25.10.2018Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd. (Earlier known as Vodafone Essar South Ltd.), (A company registered under the Companies Act), having its regis...
Case Number: 124
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-10-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 847 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 28/03/2017 in Complaint No. 333/2013 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. DR, UTTAMKUMAR SAMANTA11/5 RISHI AUROBINDA PARK, BIRATI, KOLKATA-700051...........Appellant(s)...
Case Number: 847
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-10-2018
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate A.P Kaushal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/839/2017Date of Institution:30/11/2017Date of Decision:05/10/2018Amandeep Singh S/o S.Raghbir Singh, R/o H.No.91-B, Partap Nagar, Patiala, presently residing at H.No.100, Phase-6, Mohali, Punja...
Case Number: 839
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-10-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Vodafone in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Vodafone ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Vodafone under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.