
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. TEMPLE LAW FIRM
Respondant Advocate MR. R.V. SINHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 533 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 24/11/2006 in Appeal No. 2964/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. DR. R.P. MANGALS/O. OF LATE , SHRI SITA RM MANGAL RESIDENT OF 37 /372 DAYAL BAGH RAOD PS...
Case Number: 533
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2007
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. TEMPLE LAW FIRM
Respondant Advocate MR. R.V. SINHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 533 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 24/11/2006 in Appeal No. 2964/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. DR. R.P. MANGALS/O. OF LATE , SHRI SITA RM MANGAL RESIDENT OF 37 /372 DAYAL BAGH RAOD PS...
Case Number: 534
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2007
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. TEMPLE LAW FIRM
Respondant Advocate MR. R.V. SINHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 533 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 24/11/2006 in Appeal No. 2964/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. DR. R.P. MANGALS/O. OF LATE , SHRI SITA RM MANGAL RESIDENT OF 37 /372 DAYAL BAGH RAOD PS...
Case Number: 535
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2007
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MUNEEB EFFENDI
Respondant Advocate MR. R.V. SINHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3792 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 10/08/2007 in Appeal No. 1697/2005-1741/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SHANTI KUMAR JAINS/O SRI VIJAY KUMAR JAIN R/O 372/1, SAMRAHI RAOD, SAHADATGANJ...
Case Number: 3792
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MULLAPUDI RAMBABU
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 315 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 28/06/2011 in Complaint No. 165/2001 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. S.C. MARIAPPANS/o. Chellam, no. 7/1, Thatchi Arunachalam, Street, Mylapore, Chennai-600004Tamil...
Case Number: 315
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. SAROJ BIDAWAT BANSAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 562 OF 2012 IN RP/1916/20121. UNION OF INDIA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. NARESH AHLAWAT & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'B...
Case Number: 562
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2012
Court Name: Jalpaiguri
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, JALPAIGURI Complaint Case No. CC 73/20111. Smt. Mira ChakrobortyW/o Sri. Sukumar Chakroborty, Golbagan, near PatakuraClub, Post:- Coochbehar, P.S:- Kotwali Dist:- Coochbehar............Complainant(s)Versus1. Union of India General Manag...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-12-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3308 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/07/2011 in Appeal No. 267/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. K. N. PAREEK S/o Late Shri N Pareeek, R/o 299 Khuteton La Rasta Kishnapole BazarJaipur - 3020...
Case Number: 3308
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R.V. SINHA
Respondant Advocate MR. J.P. SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1115 OF 2005(Against the Order dated 31/12/2004 in Appeal No. 1268/2003 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATION NEW DELHI NEW DELHI ...........Petitio...
Case Number: 1115
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2005
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R L Vishkarma
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2012/1768(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Braham Pal Singh a BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Ram Charan Chaudhary PRESID...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 13-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Union Of India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Union Of India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Union Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.