company-name-logo

Union Bank Of India

Latest Judgments

Total 2910 Consumer Court Cases Against Union Bank Of India.

Madhya Pradesh

AWADH RANI V/S UNION BANK OF INDIA

Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SH. NARESH CHOURASIA

Respondant Advocate SH. YASH VIDHYARTHI

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPALPLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 1123 OF 2011(Arising out of order dated 23.12.2010 passed in C.C.No.152/2010 by the District Forum Sagar)UNION BANK OF INDIA. … APPELLANT.VersusAWADH RANI & ORS....

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 21-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 28-03-2019

Madhya Pradesh

NANHE BHAI V/S UNION BANK OF INDIA

Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SH. NARESH CHOURASIA

Respondant Advocate SH. YASH VIDHYARTHI / SH. R. TIWARI

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPALPLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 1124 OF 2011(Arising out of order dated 23.12.2010 passed in C.C.No.151/2010 by the District Forum Sagar)UNION BANK OF INDIA. … APPELLANT.VersusNANHE BHAI & ORS....

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 21-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 28-03-2019

Uttar Pradesh

Ram Neti Singh V/S Union Bank Of India

Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Subhash Goswami , Rajesh Chadha

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2001/3082( Date of Filing : 26 Dec 2001 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Union Bank Of IndiaAzamgarh..........

Case Number: 2001

|

Date of Filing: 26-12-2001

|

Date of Upload: 25-04-2019

Madhya Pradesh

UNION BANK OF INDIA V/S SAURABH SHRIVASTAVA

Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

13.3.2019. None for the appellant. Shri Somendra Saxena, learned counsel for respondent. Dismissed for want of prosecution. (Justice Shantanu Kemkar) (Dr. Monika Malik) President Member...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 31-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 14-03-2019

Madhya Pradesh

UNION BANK OF INDIA V/S JEEWANLAL AHIRWAR

Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SH. R.S. YADAV

Respondant Advocate SH. H.R. MUTREJA

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 485 OF 2013(Arising out of order dated 21.02.2013 passed in C. C. No.162/2012 by District Forum, Vidisha)1. JEEWAN LAL AHIRWAR, S/O LATE SHRI LAXMAN AHIRWAR,2. BHAV SINGH, S/O LATE...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 09-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 11-03-2019

Madhya Pradesh

MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA V/S DR.GHANSHYAM GUPTA

Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SH.UMESHWAR DAYAL

Respondant Advocate

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPALPLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL REVISION PETITION NO. 76 OF 2017(Arising out of order dated 25.08.2017 passed in C.C.No.214/2016 by the District Forum, Satna)DR. GHANSHYAM GUPTA. … PETITIONERVersusMANAGER, UNION BA...

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 19-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-03-2019

Madhya Pradesh

UNION BANK OF INDIA V/S ASHISH SHRIWASTAV

Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SH. UMESHWAR DAYAL

Respondant Advocate SH. ABHISHEK AGARWAL

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 2965 OF 2008(Arising out of order dated 15.10.2007 passed in C. C. No.231/2007 by District Forum, Jabalpur)ASHISH SHRIVASTAVA,S/O SHRI K. L. SHRIVASTAVA,R/O 11, SWASTIK COMPLEX, RU...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 06-12-2008

|

Date of Upload: 02-03-2019

NCDRC

CHIEF MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA & 4 ORS. V/S DEVENDRA KUMAR GOEL

Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHARAD K AGRAWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1036 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 12/07/2016 in Complaint No. 323/2015 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DEVENDRA KUMAR GOELPRESETLY AT KC 102/02, OLD KAVI NAGAR, GHAZIABAD (UP)...........Appellant(...

Case Number: 1036

|

Date of Filing: 23-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-03-2019

NCDRC

DEVENDRA KUMAR GOEL V/S CHIEF MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA & 4 ORS.

Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. O.P. GAGGAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1036 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 12/07/2016 in Complaint No. 323/2015 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DEVENDRA KUMAR GOELPRESETLY AT KC 102/02, OLD KAVI NAGAR, GHAZIABAD (UP)...........Appellant(...

Case Number: 1079

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-03-2019

Delhi

Union Bank of India V/S Kishan Singh

Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India   Union Bank Of India  

Court Name: West Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST)150-151; COMMUNINTY CENTRE; C-BLOCK; JANAK PURI; NEW DELHI-110059CASE NO. 106/2015SH. KISHAN SINGH S/o LT. SH. PURAN SINGHR/o FLAT NO. 277, C.A. APARTMENTS, PASCHIM VIHAR, NEW DELHI-110063. …..ComplainantVERSUSUNION BANK ...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 13-02-2015

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Union Bank Of India in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Union Bank Of India ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Union Bank Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.