
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ALKA JOSHI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No.432 of 2016Date of Institution: 17.05.2016 Date of Decision: 03.06.2016The executive Engineer (OP) Division, UHBBVN Ltd., Jagadhari, Distt. Yamuna Nagar (HRY.)The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sub-Urban Su...
Case Number: 432
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-08-2016
Court Name: Ambala
Appelant Advocate In person.
Respondant Advocate Sarvjeet Singh
CC No.154 of 2015 Dinesh Kumar Vs. SDO UHBVNLPresent: None for complainant. Sh. Sarvjeet Singh, Adv. counsel for Ops. Case called several times since morning but neither complaina...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 05-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-06-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Sunil Saroha
Respondant Advocate Satbir
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.432 of 2015Instituted on: 26.11.2015 Date of order: 03.06.2016Hukam Singh son of Lahri Singh, resident of H.No.71/26, Suri Petrol Pump Wali Gali, Sonepat.…Complainant. VersusSDO UHBVN Industrial ...
Case Number: 432
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 10-06-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.D.BHATIA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First appeal No.390 of 2015Date of the Institution: 29.04.2015Date of Decision: 02.06.2016UHBVN Kaithal through its SDO (OP) No.11, Kaithal,Tehsil and District Kaithal.XEN, UHBVN, Kaithal.Chairman, UHBVN, Kaithal. .&...
Case Number: 390
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ROHIT DHEER
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No.490 of 2015Date of Institution: 15.05.2015/29.05.2015 Date of Decision: 02.06.2016S.D.O. ‘OP’ Sub Division, UHBVN, Beri Distt. Jhajjar, Haryana…..AppellantVersusLalit Kumar S/o Sh....
Case Number: 490
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.D.BHATIA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First appeal No.532 of 2015Date of the Institution: 16.06.2015Date of Decision: 02.06.2016UHBVNL Shakti Bhawan, Sector-6, Panchkula through its Managing Director or Executive Engineer, Model town Division, UHBBVN, Pa...
Case Number: 532
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AMARDEEP HOODA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 1014 of 2015Date of Institution: 27.11.2015Date of Decision : 18.05.2016Sub Divisional Officer (Op.) City Sub Division, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Jhajjar, Tehsil and District Jhajjar...
Case Number: 1014
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Vikas Kamboj
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 865 of 2012. Date of institution: 13.08.2012 Date of decision: 16.05.2016.Pritam Yadav aged about 53 years son of Sh. Suraj Lal Yadav resident of Gulab Nagar, Jagadhri, Tehsil Jagadhri, District Yam...
Case Number: 865
|
Date of Filing: 13-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 22-06-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NEERAJ GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Revision Petition No: 18 of 2016Date of Institution : 10.02.2016Date of Decision : 12.05.2016Kuldeep Singh s/o Sh. Mange Ram, Resident of Village Kalayat, Tehsil Kalayat, District Kaithal. Petitioner/ComplainantVersu...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-05-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate K.K. MALIK
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.91 of 2015 Instituted on:17.03.2015 Date of order:12.05.2016Vikas son of Maha Singh, resident of Chopra colony, Gohana, Distt. Sonepat. ...Complainant. VersusSDO ‘OP’ City Divn. UHBVN Gohan...
Case Number: 91
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-06-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvnl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvnl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvnl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.