
Court Name: Jind
Appelant Advocate Sh. D.S. Lohan
Respondant Advocate Sh V.K. Bhardwaj
BEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, JIND. Complaint No. 182 of 2013 Date of institution:-16.8.2013 Date of decision:- 11.7.2016 Ranjit Singh son of Sh. Gulzari resident of village Dhakal, Tehsil Narwana, District Jind.. ...Complain...
Case Number: 182
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ALKA JOSHI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 340 of 2016Date of Institution: 20.04.2016Date of Decision : 08.07.2016Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited (OP) Sub Division Kundli, Tehsil and District Sonipat through its Sub Divisional Offic...
Case Number: 340
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2016
Court Name: Jind
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Sh A.S. Saini
BEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, JIND. Complaint No. 54 of 2012 Date of institution:-6.2.2012 Date of decision:-8.7.2016 Ramphal s/o Jhunda r/o village Badhana, Tehsil and District Jind. ...Complainant. Versus UHBVN through the ...
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Mannu Malik
Respondant Advocate Amit Balyan
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.478 of 2015 Instituted on:24.12.2015 Date of order:04.07.2016Sanjay Kumar son of Manphool Singh, r/o Lal Darwaja, near Harijan Chopal, tehsil and distt. Sonepat. ...Complainant. VersusSDO UHBVN Lt...
Case Number: 478
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Jagdeep Balyan
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.476 of 2015Instituted on: 24.12.2015 Date of order: 01.07.2016Chander Bhan son of Mange Ram, resident of Ward no.1, Mohalla Jatwara, Sonepat.…Complainant. VersusSDO UHBVN City Zone Sonepat. &hell...
Case Number: 476
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2016
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Kumar Sharma
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/15/2921. Om ParkashSon of Hans Raj R/o Near jainsons Exports, Barsat Road PanipatPanipatHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNLShakti Bhawan, Sector 6, Panchkula, through its S.D.O, City Sub Division, ...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2016
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Vijay Kumar Chaudhary
Respondant Advocate Zile Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 744 of 2013. Date of institution: 08.10.2013. Date of decision: 09.06.2016.Hans Raj aged about 70 years son of Shri Chandgi Ram, resident of Deha Basti, Chhota Bans Radaur, Tehsil Jagadhri, Dist...
Case Number: 744
|
Date of Filing: 08-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-06-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SUSHIL KUMAR SHRMA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First appeal No.1128 of 2015Date of the Institution: 30.12.2015Date of Decision: 06.06.2016J.E.Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Sub-Division, Beri.SDO, UHBVNL,Division Beri, District Jhajjar. .….Appel...
Case Number: 1128
|
Date of Filing: 30-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2016
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Mamraj Chhokar
Respondant Advocate None
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/14/4751. Ishwar Son of Sh. Kacheru R/O Village Simla Gujran Sub-Tehsil Bapoli Distt. PanipatPanipatHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. UHBVNLPanipat through its S.D.O (OP) Sub Division Chhajpur Distt. Pan...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate PARMOD PARMAR
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No : 1096 of 2015Date of Institution: 21.12.2015Date of Decision : 03.06.2016Rajender Singh s/o Sh. Raghu Nath, Resident of Village Babra, Tehsil and District Jhajjar. Appellant-ComplainantVersusSub Divis...
Case Number: 1096
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 08-07-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvnl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvnl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvnl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.