
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First appeal No.764 of 2014Date of the Institution: 29.08.2014Date of Decision: 10.03.20161. SDO (OP) UHBVNL, Sub Division, Assandh, District Karnal.2. UHBVNL, Sector-6, Panchkula through its Managing Director. .&hel...
Case Number: 764
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-04-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate SANJAY KANKARWAL
Respondant Advocate Neeraj Malik
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.30 of 2015Instituted on: 02.02.2015 Date of order:01.03.2016 Raghubir Singh son of Munshi Ram, r/o village Kundli, tehsil and Distt. Sonepat.…Complainant. VersusSDO ‘OP’ Sub Division ...
Case Number: 30
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate J.S. SAINI
Respondant Advocate Amit Balyan
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.235 of 2015 Instituted on:27.07.2015 Date of order:26.02.20161.Gopi Chand son of Charan Dass 2. Narender alias Narender Singh son of Sarup Singh, resident of village Kilohard, tehsil and distt. Sonepat....
Case Number: 235
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K.K.CHAHAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 1064 of 2015 Date of Institution: 11.12.2015 Date of Decision: 25.02.2016Omphal son of Shri Surat Singh, resident of Dher Pana, Meham, Tehsil Meham, District Rohtak, Haryana. Appellant-Complai...
Case Number: 1064
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate L.S. KAUSHIK
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT.Complaint No.339 of 2014 Instituted on:10.12.2014 Date of order:25.02.2016Rajinder son of Lakhmi Chand, r/o village Guhna, Distt. Sonepat. ..Complainant. Versus1.JE UHBVN Sub Office Farmana, distt. Sonepat.2.UHBVN th...
Case Number: 339
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ALKA JOSHI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No.59 of 2016 Date of Institution:19.01.2016 Date of decision:17.02.2016Additional Executive Engineer, UHBVNL, Sub-division Model Town, Yamuna Nagar.The Chairman, UHBVNL, Sector-6, Shakti Bhawan, Panc...
Case Number: 59
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 17 of 2016Date of Institution: 06.01.2016Date of Decision : 01.02.2016Vimal Kumar s/o Sh. Sat Parkash, Village Gajlana, Tehsil Thanesar, District Kurukshetra. Appellants/Opposite PartiesVersus1. The...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate VIRENDER SINGH MALIK
Respondant Advocate
Dr. Balwanti V/s S.D.O. U.H.B.V.N.L.Present: Shri Rajesh, Adv. for Complainant – DH. Shri Rajesh, Adv. for complainant-DH has made a statement that he does not want to continue his present execution petition and withdraw the same, Statement recorded separately. Hence the sa...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.D.BHATIA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First appeal No.561 of 2014Date of the Institution: 03.07.2015Date of Decision: 05.01.20161. SDO (OP, Sub division, UHBVNL, Sampla, Tehsil Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar.2. J.E. (OP.), sub Office, UHBVNL, Chhara, Tehs...
Case Number: 561
|
Date of Filing: 03-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate GAURAV DEEP GOEL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 611 of 2015 Date of Institution 17.07.2015 Date of Decision 24.12.2015Krishna Kumari wife of Sh. Tara Chand, resident of 66, Sector 13, Karnal.Appellant-ComplainantVersus1. Sub Divisional Of...
Case Number: 611
|
Date of Filing: 17-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Uhbvnl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Uhbvnl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Uhbvnl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.