company-name-logo

Tractor

Latest Judgments

Total 773 Consumer Court Cases Against Tractor.

Uttarakhand

Naseem Sidhqui, Propriter Kashipur Tractor Company & others V/S Mr. Laxman Singh

Tractor  

Court Name: Udham Singh Nagar

Appelant Advocate Mohd. Sakib

Respondant Advocate Mr. Rakesh Kumar Agarwal

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 30-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 14-09-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Srinath S/o Harshu & Others V/S Manager Swaraj Tractor Pratapgarh Auto Service

Tractor  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Vishal Srivastava

Respondant Advocate -

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2013/1096( Date of Filing : 20 May 2013 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Sri Natha...........Appellant(s)Ve...

Case Number: 2013

|

Date of Filing: 01-05-2013

|

Date of Upload: 14-09-2022

Bihar

Pandey Tractors Distributor,, New Holland Tractor Mairwa, Siwan And Others V/S Kamleshawar Ray, S/o-Rama Ray

Tractor  

Court Name: Siwan

Appelant Advocate Narendra Kumar Singha

Respondant Advocate Vijay Kumar Tiwari

Case Number: 256

|

Date of Filing: 21-11-2015

|

Date of Upload: 13-09-2022

West Bengal

Sunil Agarwal, Prop. Of S.N. Automobile, Auhtorised Dealer, Mahindra & Mahindra Tractor V/S Sri Joydeep Mukherjee, S/O- Prodip Mukherjee

Mahindra & Mahindra   Tractor  

Court Name: Dakshin Dinajpur

Appelant Advocate Madhumita Das

Respondant Advocate Debashis Barman

The instant case has been initiated by the complainant U/S – 12 of C.P. Act,1986 against the Opposite Parties claiming to return back the tractor + Compensation Rs.50,000/- + Litigation cost of Rs.15,000/- Total – Rs. 65,000/- . The fact of the case, in brief, is tha...

Case Number: 135

|

Date of Filing: 19-11-2019

|

Date of Upload: 03-11-2022

Haryana

MOHAN TRACTOR PVT. LTD. V/S DAYA RAM

Tractor  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate HIMANSHU RAO

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/793/2017( Date of Filing : 08 Dec 2017 )1. DAYA RAM H.NO. 276, MOHALLA ADARSH NAGAR, WARD NO. 3, NARNAUL. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MOHAN TRACTOR PVT. LTD. VILLAGE NIKHRI, TEHSIL AND DISTT. REWARI. ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: S ....

Case Number: 793

|

Date of Filing: 08-12-2017

|

Date of Upload: 07-09-2022

Madhya Pradesh

MANAGER PREET TRACTOR PVT LTD OFFICE PATIALA PUNJAB V/S SHRI ARATI MOTORS PVT LTD PROP AJAY BAHADUR SINGH

Tractor  

Court Name: Rewa

Appelant Advocate RAVI BAHADUR SINGH

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 12-01-2022

|

Date of Upload: 28-09-2022

Orissa

The C.E.O.,CUM-M.D., Kubota Agricaltural Machinery , Tractor India Pvt. Ltd. Chennai V/S Aitu Harijan

Tractor  

Court Name: Nabarangapur

Appelant Advocate Sri S.K Sahu

Respondant Advocate None

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 07-01-2021

|

Date of Upload: 30-08-2022

Uttar Pradesh

General Manager Proprietor Mahindra & Mahindra Tractor Agency V/S Shri, Chandrash Patel S/o Shri, Mithai Lal Patel

Tractor  

Court Name: Jaunpur

Appelant Advocate Mrs . Advocate

Respondant Advocate Mrs. Advocate

Case Number: 201

|

Date of Filing: 14-12-2021

|

Date of Upload: 29-08-2022

Madhya Pradesh

Dir/Md, Pankaj Tractor And Motors Satna V/S Rajesh Dwivedi S/o Shri Kamla Prasad

Tractor  

Court Name: Satna

Appelant Advocate TEJBHAN TIWARI

Respondant Advocate NA

Case Number: 63

|

Date of Filing: 27-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2022

West Bengal

Prop, M.Automobiles, Dealer, T and M, Farguson Tractor V/S Ramesh Ch Garai, S/O Lt K.Garai

Tractor  

Court Name: Birbhum

Appelant Advocate Sanjit Kr Achatya

Respondant Advocate

Smt. Sukla Sengupta-President. Complainant is found absent without taking any steps now 1:20 pm, the case is taken up for hearing. On a close scrutiny of the materials on record it appears since long the complainant is directed to show cause as to why shall not be dismissed. But ...

Case Number: 67

|

Date of Filing: 09-06-2016

|

Date of Upload: 18-08-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tractor in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tractor ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Tractor under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.