
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev kaushik
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Execution Petition No. EA/94 of 2016 INSTITUTED ON: 01.06.2016 DATE OF ORDER: 17.08.20161. Sanjeev Kaushik s/o Hari Parkash Kaushik R/o New mahavir Colony, Opp. Chandan Petrol Pump, near Vinayak Garden, Shani Mandir ...
Case Number: 94
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2016
Court Name: Sirsa
Appelant Advocate Harish Chhabra
Respondant Advocate Ravinder monga
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/14/911. BalramVillage Sardulgarh Disst MansaMansaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Shivam TelecomsirsasirsaHaryana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Sh S.B Lohia PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Ranbir Singh MEMBER For the Complainant:Hari...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-08-2016
Court Name: Sirsa
Appelant Advocate AK Monga
Respondant Advocate RK Mehta
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 245/111. Ramesh Kathuria Mohata Garden begu Road SirsaSirsaHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Shree Ganesh Telecomnear old Civil hosiptal sirsaSirsaHaryana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Sh S.B Lohia PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Ranbir...
Case Number: 245
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 16-08-2016
Court Name: Koraput
Appelant Advocate Sri T. Singh Lal
Respondant Advocate Self
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM KORAPUT AT JEYPORE,ODISHAComplaint Case No. CC/15/661. Smt. Smita PadhiAt/Paik Street, Near Sub Collector Office, PO/Jayanagar, Jeypore KoraputOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The SDO, BSNL, Jeypore Telecom DepartmentAt/Post/Via-Je...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 27-12-2016
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABExecution Application No. EA/16/26InComplaint Case No. CC/15/2301. Jackyson of Satish kumar r/o Sangat Mandi,Bathinda...........Appellant(s)Versus1. V...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-08-2016
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint no.178 of 2016 Date of instt.: 03.06.2016 Date of decision 03.08.2016Sanjeev Kumar son of Shri Mai Chand ward no.2, Jail Singh Colony, Gharaunda Karnal. …..Complainant Versus1. Bhagwati Telecom, Ra...
Case Number: 178
|
Date of Filing: 03-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-08-2016
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST)GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI150-151, Community Centre, C-Block, Janak Puri, New Delhi – 110058 Date of institution : 10.9.15Complainant Case No-637/2015 Date of order : 3.8.16In the matter of Gulshan K...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2016
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST)GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI150-151, Community Centre, C-Block, Janak Puri, New Delhi – 110058 Date of institution : 10.9.15Complainant Case No-637/2015 Date of order : 3.8.16In the matter of Gulsha...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2016
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh.Birbal Sohail
Respondant Advocate Sh. Kunal Juneja
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 397/20141. Ravi Parkashson of Tek Ram, resident of House No.715./34, Hari Singh Colony, Sunarian Chowk, Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Jagdamba Telecom1. Jagdamba Telecom, Gol Market, ...
Case Number: 397
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2016
Court Name: Papum Pare
Appelant Advocate Mr. N Rama
Respondant Advocate
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPUPAM PARE DISTRICT YUPIA ARUNACHAL PRADESHComplaint Case No. LMCA-145/151. Rama Hina Nabam Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MD. Clay Telecom Falcon Pvt.Ltd.Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh.............
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Telecom in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Telecom ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Telecom under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.