company-name-logo

Telecom

Latest Judgments

Total 3921 Consumer Court Cases Against Telecom.

West Bengal

. General Mananger, BSNL, Suri Telecom District V/S Susmita Mukherjee

Telecom  

Court Name: Birbhum

Appelant Advocate Samarpita Mukherjee

Respondant Advocate

The case of the complainant Susmita Mukherjee, in brief, is that she is / was customer under the O.P Company having its telephone connection being No. 03462256485 and she used to pay bills and other charges to the O.P office regularly within due date prescribed by the O.P Co. It ...

Case Number: 95

|

Date of Filing: 13-07-2015

|

Date of Upload: 28-07-2016

Rajasthan

TARIN TELECOM AND ELE. V/S SMT SULOCHNA

Telecom  

Court Name: Churu

Appelant Advocate JAGDISH RAWAT

Respondant Advocate SURESH SHARMA

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 98/20151. SMT SULOCHNA LOHIYA STADUM KE SAMNE SUJANGARH CHURU...........Complainant(s)Versus1. TARIN TELECOM AND ELE. SHOP NO 4 AND 17 GROUND FLOOR SUJANGARH CHURU............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Shiv Shankar PRESIDENT Subash Chandra ...

Case Number: 98

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 29-07-2016

Punjab

Aggarwal Telecom V/S Anoop Kumar Miglani S/o Gobind Ram

Telecom  

Court Name: Jalandhar

Appelant Advocate Sh Rohit Chopra

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/241/20161. Anoop Kumar Miglani S/o Gobind RamR/o H.No.17,Balwant Nagar,Back side,Tagore HospitalJalandharPunjab...........Co...

Case Number: 241

|

Date of Filing: 03-06-2016

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2016

Punjab

Krishna Telecom V/S Shivam Sanan S/o Shri Harvinder Kumar

Telecom  

Court Name: Jalandhar

Appelant Advocate Sh Ashok Sharma

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/104/20161. Shivam Sanan S/o Shri Harvinder KumarHouse No.21,Vikas puri Tanda Road,JalandharPunjab...........Complainant(s)Ve...

Case Number: 104

|

Date of Filing: 09-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 16-08-2016

Chandigarh

SP-AKS Telecom V/S Ravinder Kumar

Telecom  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:329/2016Date of Institution:11.05.2016Date of Decision:18.07.2016 Ravinder Kumar s/o Sh.Raj Kumar r/o H.No.2035/2, Near Sabzi Mandi Gali, Burail, Sector 45, Chandigarh -160047. ... Complainant.Ver...

Case Number: 329

|

Date of Filing: 11-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-08-2016

Haryana

Shri Bala Ji Telecom Op 1 Spice Retial Ltd. Op 2 M/S Sonu Mobile Shop Op 3 V/S Joginder Singh

Telecom  

Court Name: Jind

Appelant Advocate Sh Vinod Bansal

Respondant Advocate Gohana Road Jind

BEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, JIND. Complaint No. 137 of 2015 Date of Institution: 30.9.2015 Date of final order: 18.7.2016Joginder Singh son of Sumer Singh resident of house No.4559, Sector-11, Urban Estate, Jind. ...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 30-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 10-08-2016

Punjab

Deepak Telecom V/S Harpinder Singh

Telecom  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Mukesh K.Garg

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 988 Instituted on: 03.09.2015 Decided on: 15.07.2016Harpinder Singh son of S. Paviter Singh, resident of Near Society Wali Gali, Amargarh, District Sangrur. …Complainant Versus1. Fateh Telecom (Formerly Dee...

Case Number: 988

|

Date of Filing: 03-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 21-07-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Ramesh Chandra V/S Telecom

Telecom  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sunil Sharma

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2009/1245(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Telecom a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Ramesh Chandraa...........Respondent(s) B...

Case Number: 2009

|

Date of Filing: 27-07-2009

|

Date of Upload: 16-01-2017

Rajasthan

BHADU AND PUNIYA TELECOM REPAIRING AND MOBILE REPAIRING CENTER V/S DHAMODHAR PRASAD AACHARY

Telecom  

Court Name: Nagaur

Appelant Advocate SELF

Respondant Advocate Sh Bhuraram Bikuniya

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/271/20151. DHAMODHAR PRASAD AACHARYNagaurNagaurRajasthan...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BHADU AND PUNIYA TELECOM REPAIRING AND MOBILE REPAIRING CENTERSugan Singh CircleNagaurRajasthan............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Shri ...

Case Number: 271

|

Date of Filing: 02-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 22-07-2016

Haryana

Abhinav Telecom V/S Ram Narain S/o Ranbir Singh

Telecom  

Court Name: Sonipat

Appelant Advocate Sandeep Dahiya

Respondant Advocate

RAM NARAIN VS. ABHINAV TELECON ETC.Present : complainant – DH in person. Sh. Punnet on behalf of respondents-JDs no. 1to 3ORDER Complainant-DH has made a statement that he does not want to continue with the present execution petition since he has received new mobile set fr...

Case Number: 93

|

Date of Filing: 01-06-2016

|

Date of Upload: 03-08-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Telecom in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Telecom ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Telecom under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.