
Court Name: North Goa
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM NORTH GOA, PORVORIM,GOAComplaint Case No. CC/109/20141. Kamlakant G. Bhartu HNo. 103, Indira Bhuvan, Near Dattatreya Temple, Dattawadi, Mapusa Goa 403507NorthGoa...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Limited Represented by its ...
Case Number: 109
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2015
Court Name: Kurnool
Appelant Advocate P.Siva Sudarshan
Respondant Advocate Sri.T.Eswar Babu
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/103/20131. B.Praveen Kumar, S/o B.SamuelH.No.86/289/5/5, Mahalakshmi Nagar, B-Camp, Kurnool - 518 002.KurnoolAndhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Proprietor, Sony Experience StoreMountain Plaza, Opp Lumbini Jewel Mall, Banjara Hill...
Case Number: 103
|
Date of Filing: 18-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-02-2015
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC/235/14 Dated: In the matter of:Sh. Arvind Sharma,S/o Sh. S.N Sharma,196-J, 2nd fl, Ramesh Market,East of Kailash, New Delhi-65…...
Case Number: 235
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2015
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate Narinder Singh
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA. C.C.No.810 of 27.11.2014 Date of decision:30.01.2015 Inderjit Singh, Senior XEN Punjab State Transmission Corporation Limited & resident of 243, Gurbagh Colony, Chandigarh Road, Ludhiana. ….Complainant. ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2015
Court Name: Vadodara
Appelant Advocate SELF
Respondant Advocate
CDRF VADODARA MAINANAND NAGAR,KARELIBAUG,VADODARAComplaint Case No. CC/14/6731. MRS. SHRUTI VADODARA BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE P.O.LAD PRESIDENT MRS. VANDANA BHATT MEMBER MRS. KAMAL P. SHAH MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERDISPOSED OFF [HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 170/20131. SH. JONY VILLAGE-TIBRA, POST-MODINAGAR, DISTRICT-GHAZIABAD U.P.201204 BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI HARPAL SINGH PRESIDENTHON'BLE MS. MS. VANDANA MISHRA MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDERJONI VS SONY ERRICSON SETT...
Case Number: 170
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A. K. Mishra
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2001/2568(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Rajesh Sony a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Om Automobilesa...........Respondent(...
Case Number: 2001
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2001
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S. KRISHNAKUMAR
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, VAZHUTHACADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURM. REVISION PETITION.17/14ORDER DATED:07.01.2015PRESENTJUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATH ALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V JOSE : MEMBERSony Augustine, Branch Manager,M/s. IndusInd Bank,Alapuzha Branch, CSN. Buildi...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 20-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Execution Application No. EA/12/85InComplaint Case No. CC/11/1161. Harish KumarDirector, Rich life Interiors and Exteriors, Poojappura...........Appellant(s)Versus1. The MD, Sony Ericsson Mobile Co...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Unit-1, Kolkata8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site : confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/13/1301. Dibyajyoti Datta393, Dum Dum Park, Kolkata-700055.KolkataWB...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Manager/Authorised Officer,...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.