
Court Name: Central Mumbai
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd Floor, General Nagesh Marg, Near Mahatma Gandhi HospitalParel, Mumbai-400 012Execution Application No. EA/14/12InComplaint Case No. CC/14/271. LAXMI SHETTYBLOCK A-114,TYPE-3 C.G.S COLONY,NR.WADALA (W...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/14/1971. JOSE JOYEDATHALA NORTH P.O.ALUVA-683564...........Complainant(s)Versus1. AREA SERVICE IN-CHARGE SONY INDIA PVT LIMITEDMUSCUT TOWER,KADAVANTHRA,KOCHI,PIN-682 0202. MANAGER MADONA CARE CENTREMENAKA ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2015
Court Name: Malappuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL MALAPPURAMComplaint Case No. CC/22/20141. MUHAMMED SHAFI A PALIPARAMBIL HOUSE KALENGALPADI O K MURI POSTMALAPPURAM DIST 676 519...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY MOBILES COMMUNICATIONS (INDIA) PVT LTD4TH FLOOR DAKHA HOUSE 18/17 WEA KAROL B...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate K.K.ASHKAR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/13/4451. K.K.ANWARS/O LATE A.M.KHADAR,KANAVARA HOUSE,PNRA 104,CHANGAMPUZHA NAGAR,KALAMASSERY,KOCHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY INDIA PRIVATE LTDCORPORATE OFFICE,A-31,MOHAN CO-OPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2015
Court Name: Central Mumbai
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd Floor, General Nagesh Marg, Near Mahatma Gandhi HospitalParel, Mumbai-400 012Complaint Case No. CC/12/2561. Sachin Yaswant PadadShivkrup Housing Soc. 1/19,2R Robodi,Shivaji Nagar, Thane...........Com...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Krishna at Vijaywada
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIVIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICTComplaint Case No. CC/14/20141. Yerineni Vamsi MohanS/o Subhashchendra Bose, Indian, Hindu, aged 36 years, Business, R/O F-3, Amrutha Apartments, Sri Nagar Colony, Vijayawada...........Complainant...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Central Mumbai
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd Floor, General Nagesh Marg, Near Mahatma Gandhi HospitalParel, Mumbai-400 012Complaint Case No. CC/12/2561. Sachin Yaswant PadadShivkrup Housing Soc. 1/19,2R Robodi,Shivaji Nagar, Thane...........Com...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. N.S. JAGDEVA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2323 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 05/03/2014 in Appeal No. 75/2014 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. DR. SURINDERPAL SINGHS/O SH.GURDEV SINGH, R/O H.NO-1685,SECTOR - 34-DCHANDIGARH...........Pet...
Case Number: 2323
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 03-07-2014
Court Name: South Goa
Appelant Advocate Dene N. Rosairo
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,SOUTH GOAMARGAO-GOAComplaint Case No. CC/13/35A1. Ms.Bakeeta AlbuquerquePequeno Pulvaddo,H.No.518, Benaulim, Salcete-Goa............Complainant(s)Versus1. The Manager Sony India Pvt. Ltd. & othersMohan Co-oerative Industrial E...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 03-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate Manjula N.A.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/56/2013( Date of Filing : 25 Feb 2013 )1. Ramesh RS.o R. Govindaraj, Mangalore...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony Mobile Communication India Ltd.New Delhi ............Opp.Par...
Case Number: 56
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-12-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.