
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate K. Vinod Kumar
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamKottayamComplaint Case No. CC/201/20141. Jayesh KumarRaj Nivas Kanakkary Village Pattithanam P.O.KottayamKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India (P) LtdA-31, Mohan Co-Operative Industrial Estate Mathura Road New Delhi-110044Ne...
Case Number: 201
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Mannu Malik
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT.Complaint No.201 of 2015 Instituted on:16.06.2015 Date of order:29.02.2016Sunil Pal H.No.44/7, Mohan Nagar, Rohtak road, Sonepat. ..Complainant. Versus1.The Manager, Sonepat Service, Sony Authorized Service Centre, S...
Case Number: 201
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
D.o.F:29/12/2016D.o.O:20/02/2016IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD CC.NO.326/16 Dated this, the 20th day of February 2016PRESENT:SMT.P.RAMADEVI : PRESIDENTSMT.BEENA K.G : MEMBERSMT.SHIBA.M.SAMUEL : MEMBERSandeep ,Rohini Nivas, : ComplainantRailway Gate,Kottac...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 04-03-2016
Court Name: Malappuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL MALAPPURAMComplaint Case No. CC/223/20131. FARAS HAMEEDFANSEEM MAHAL HOUSE NILAMBUR POSTMALAPPRAM DIST...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MANAGER SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATION INDIA LTDSECO FLOOR A 31 MOHAN CO OPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE MADHURA ROA...
Case Number: 223
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2016
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate Subrata Sarkar
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/70/20161. Sourendra Nath Dutt171/A, Bidhan Sarani, P.S. Burtolla, Kolkata-700006............Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India(Kolkata B...
Case Number: 70
|
Date of Filing: 05-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-02-2016
Court Name: Una
Appelant Advocate Sh.Ashish Sachdeva
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM UNADISTRICT UNA (HP).Execution Application No. EA/19/2015InComplaint Case No. CC/14/121. Rajesh KumarS/o Sh. Gurdev Singh,R/o Vill. Talap, Teh. Bangana and Distt. Una(HP)-174303...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Sony Care Centre ...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 24-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2016
Court Name: East Khasi Hills
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate E.Murmu
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONEAST KHASI HILLS, SHILLONGMEGHALAYAComplaint Case No. CC/32/2014( Date of Filing : 29 Aug 2014 )1. Smti C.Tariang Shillong...........Complainant(s)Versus1. HOME CARE, Authorised Dealer, SonyMalki Shillong............Opp.Party(s) BEFO...
Case Number: 32
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2022
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Sagar Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/269/2015Date of Institution:01/05/2015Date of Decision:29/01/2016M/s Chawla Publications (P) Ltd., SCO No.4-5, Sector 17-B, Chandigarh through its Director Bhagatjit Singh Chawla.&helli...
Case Number: 269
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2016
Court Name: Solapur
Appelant Advocate M G Tajimatrak
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solapur.Behind District Treasury Office, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/15/4341. Sadiq Allabaksh ShaikhSanjeev Gandhi Nagar Vijapur Road SolapurSolapurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Pvt LtdHuma Gift and Mobile Sh...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2016
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate Fazil Rahman
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamKottayamComplaint Case No. CC/79/20141. Sony LimsonHarisree Sadanam Sreekandamangalam P.O. AthirampuzhaKottayamKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The ProprietorGrand Mobiles Near S.B. T. Main Branch Pulimoodu Junction KottayamKerala...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.