
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Vikrant Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:67 of 2016Date of Institution:23.02.2016Date of Decision:16.05.2016Anju Walia w/o Sh. Pardeep Kumar, resident of H.No.1799, Sector 29-B, Chandigarh - 160030..…Appellant/Complainant.Versus(1) Sony India...
Case Number: 67
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2016
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Bhatia
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/15/4521. Bhupinder SinghPatti Behniwal, Sultanwind, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Ltd.A-31, Mohan Co-operative Indus...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 23-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2016
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODEComplaint Case No. CC/98/20161. SREERESH KNANDANAM HO, KUZHIMAYIL MEETHAL, PAIMGOTTUPURAM, KUNNAMANGALAM PO, CALICUT...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY INDIA PVT LTDA-31, MOHAN CO- OPERATIVE INDUSTRY ESTATE, MATHURA ROAD...
Case Number: 98
|
Date of Filing: 18-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-05-2016
Court Name: Siliguri
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Case No.168/S/2013Order No.27.Dt.09.05.16. The contention of the petition filed by the complainant is that ld advocate on behalf of the complainant could not attend the Forum at the time 12.25 p.m. – 12.30. p.m. as there was a huge traffic jam on the road and that ...
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2016
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/554/20151. Porshia Mitra, D/o Tapan MitraFlat No. H-4, Cluster-2, Purbachal, Sector-3, Salt Lake, Kolkata-700097............Complainant...
Case Number: 554
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2016
Court Name: Bargarh
Appelant Advocate Sri. S.K. Panda with other Advocate
Respondant Advocate Sri. D.P. Agrawal, Advocate with other Advocates
Heading1Heading2Execution Application No. EA/3/2016InComplaint Case No. CC/14/141. Gayatri Padhiaged about 17 years, represented through father guardian Ananta Sayan Padhi, R/o ward No.19, Near Railway Station, BargarhBargarhOdisha...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Sony India Pvt. l...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-11-2016
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATExecution Application No. EA/16/22InComplaint Case No. CC/15/1951. BijenderSon of Sh. MahabirR/O Village- Biholi Tehsil SamalkhaPanipatHaryana...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Sony India Pvt. Ltd.A-31, Mohal Coop Industrial state Mat...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-06-2016
Court Name: North
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
ROOM NO.2, OLD CIVIL SUPPLY BUILDING,TIS HAZARI, DELHIComplaint Case No. CC/311/20141. ROHIT BHARIJA2102/4, CHUNAMANDI, PAHARGANJ, NEW DELHIDELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY SERVVICE CENTREE-235, OPPOSITE METRO PILLAR NO-171, BANK OF INDIA, SHASTRI NAGAR, DELHIDELHI.......
Case Number: 311
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2016
Court Name: North
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
ROOM NO.2, OLD CIVIL SUPPLY BUILDING,TIS HAZARI, DELHIComplaint Case No. CC/351/20141. KAVITA SHARMA45, VAISHALI, PITAMPURADELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY INDIAA-31, MOHAN CO-OPERATIVE, MATHURA RAODDELHI............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. MOHI PRE...
Case Number: 351
|
Date of Filing: 17-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2016
Court Name: Malappuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL MALAPPURAMComplaint Case No. CC/392/20141. MUBEEN TTHODENGAL HOUSE KADUNGAPURAM POST ANGADIPURAM VIAMALAPPURAM DIST 679 321...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDA 31 2nd FLOOR MOHAN CO OPERATIVE INDU...
Case Number: 392
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.