
Court Name: Kamrup
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKAMRUP,GUWAHATIComplaint Case No. CC/36/2011( Date of Filing : 12 Jul 2011 )1. Mr Obaidul Islam alias Manju Son of Amzad Hussain,Resident of Chetryapara, Tura...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Pvt.Ltd.Registered Office - A- 31, ...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2020
Court Name: Jalna
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Dist Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, JalnaSurvey No.488 Bypass Road, JalnaComplaint Case No. CC/21/20161. Suraj Shivajirao SableJalnaJalnaMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony Authorized Service Center,Near Shivaji Putla,JalnaJalnaMaharashtra2. 2) Sony India Pvt. L...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-06-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate J.S BABU
Respondant Advocate -
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSALCOMMISSION, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NOS.621/2013 & 660/2013COMMON JUDGMENT DATED 21/06/2016(Appeal filed against the order in C.C No.289/2010 dt. 13/08/2013 on the file of CDRF, Kottayam)PRESENT:SMT. A. RADHA : MEMBERSH...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2016
Court Name: Una
Appelant Advocate Sh. G.C. Rattan
Respondant Advocate Sh. Pawan Sharma
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM UNADISTRICT UNA (HP).Complaint Case No. 49/2015(G)1. Anshul RattanS/o. Sh. G.C. Rattan, R/o. VPO. Ghumarwin. District Bilaspur (HP) 174022...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony IndiaRegistered Office North Zone, A-31, Mohan Co...
Case Number: 49
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-06-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Mashwinder Singh
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 58 OF 2016Varun Garg Vs Sony India and othersBEFORE: DR.MANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Mashwinder Singh, Counsel for Complainant.OPs ex-parte.Dated : 15th June 2...
Case Number: 58
|
Date of Filing: 25-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Execution Application No. EA/15/27InComplaint Case No. CC/13/3901. Mohameed BasheerRansi cottage,kurakode,charumoodu,Nedumangadu,tvpm...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Sony ,Global Furnuturehome appli...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 17-06-2016
Court Name: Fatehgarh Sahib
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FATEHGARH SAHIB.Consumer Complaint No. 95 of 2015 Date of institution : 02.11.2015 Date of decision : 15.06.2016Balwinder Khanna(aged 45 years), son of Shri Ajay Khanna, resident of House No.126, Dalima Vihar, Rajpura, Tehsil Rajpura...
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-06-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated : 14/06/2016ORDER Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of OP. Sh. R.P. Singh, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the execution application that he has received a cheque of Rs.49,921/- and withdraws the execution application. In view of the ...
Case Number: 52
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate Harsimranjit Singh
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/16/1461. Shivam KapurLawrence Road, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony India Ltd.A-31, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, Mat...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-06-2016
Court Name: Pondicherry
Appelant Advocate Party in Person
Respondant Advocate
Final Order1Final Order2Complaint Case No. CC/11/20161. Chirag JainRoom no 88,Boys Hotel, Block -A, Pondicherry Engineering college pondicherry...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sony Center Represented by its Authorized Signatory and 2 othersNo.261 J.N Street,Puducherry-605001.......
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-06-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.