Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/15/3301. Tarundeep Singh1774, Gali Arorian Wali, Hall Bazar, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Snapdeal246, Okhla Industrial Estate...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 07-06-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. G.M. PADMA PRIYA & MR. RISHABH SANCHETI
Respondant Advocate MR. REEPAK KANSAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 697 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 04/01/2016 in Appeal No. 524/2015 of the State Commission Punjab)1. SNAPDEALTHROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MR. MANISH KUMAR,, 246 OKHLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE PHAS...
Case Number: 697
|
Date of Filing: 10-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2016
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri Baljit Singh Nehal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR Complaint No. 565Instituted on: 06.07.2015 Decided on: 10.02.2016Sumit Garg son of Brij Lal Garg, resident of H.No.33, Street No.2, Agar Nagar, Gaushala Road, Sangrur. …. Complainant. Versus1. Snapdeal/Jasper Infotech...
Case Number: 565
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:582/2015Date of Institution:12.10.2015Date of Decision:13/01/2016Sagar Parmar s/o Sh.Omkar Singh r/o Maharana Partap Hostel, Sector 25(West), Chandigarh ... Complainant.VersusSnapdeal, Plot No.246,...
Case Number: 582
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2016
Court Name: Chandrapur
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM CHANDRAPURComplaint Case No. CC/15/1961. Shri Subhash Pralhad Gathe Qu No 110/6 chandrapur N.T.P.C. Urjjanagar ChandrapurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Snapdeal .com At New Delhi Snapdeal Jesper Infrotek Pvt Ltd. 246 , 1 flo...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-11-2015
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri Vikramjit Garg
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 167 Instituted on: 01.04.2015 Decided on: 02.09.2015Nam Sarover Bansal son of Shri Pawan Kumar, resident of Ward No.5, Lehragaga, Tehsil Lehra, District Sangrur. …Complainant VersusSnapdeal.com, 1st Floor, ...
Case Number: 167
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2015
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate
BANGALORE URBAN DIST.CONSUMERDISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,8TH FLOOR,BWSSB BLDG.K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE560 009Complaint Case No. CC/14/18051. Sri.Sanjit MohantyS/o. B.B.P. Mohanty,R/at.Flat No. 402, R.K. Hoyasala Residency, Block 12B, 3rd Main, 9th Cross, Hoyasala Nagar, Bangalore-16.........
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-07-2015
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABExecution Application No. EA/15/22InComplaint Case No. CC/14/4231. Harmail Singhson of Ishar singh r/o Kartar Basti st.No.2,Bathinda...........Appella...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2015
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri Rajinder Goyal
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 005 Instituted on: 02.01.2015 Decided on: 26.03.2015Nikhil Bansal son of Shri Vinod Kumar Bansal R/o Gobindpura Colony, Street No.4, Near Railway Station, Sangrur. ..Complainant VersusSnapdeal, 246, First F...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 07-04-2015
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/4231. Harmail Singhson of Ishar singh r/o Kartar Basti st.No.2,Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SnapdealExt.444240 O...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Snapdeal in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Snapdeal ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Snapdeal under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.