Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/151/2017Date of Institution:16/02/2017Date of Decision:30/05/2017Ravinder Kumar s/o Late Sh. Berjinder Mohan, resident of H.No. 14, 1st Floor, Sector 27-A, Chandigarh – 160019....
Case Number: 151
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-06-2017
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODEComplaint Case No. CC/433/20151. ROCHIN ALEXKALATHOOR HO, KAVILUMPARA PO, CALICUT- 673513...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SNAPDEAL BANGLOREJASPER INFO TECH PVT. LTD, TARRACES FREMONT, 3580, 3RD FLOOR, MAIN ROAD, THE FOURTH...
Case Number: 433
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2017
Court Name: Fatehabad
Appelant Advocate Aman Bhatti
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/227/20161. Rajesh KumarS/O Shiv Kumar c/O Sangam Photostate Bhattu Mandi FatehabadHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Snapdeal237, Phase 2 Aokhala Industraia Area New DelhiEast DelhiDelhi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Raghbi...
Case Number: 227
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2017
Court Name: Fatehabad
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/108/20161. Azad SinghS/O Sube Singh V. Dhanger Teh. FatehabadFatehabadHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Snapdeal Jasper In Fotech Pvt. Ltd246, 1st Floor. Phase 3 Okhla Industrial Area New DelhiEast DelhiDelhi............Opp.Party(s) BE...
Case Number: 108
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2017
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri Ashish Kumar Grover
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRURJUDICIAL COURT COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, SANGRUR (148001)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/537/20161. Kamal KumarKamal Kumar S/o Sh. Stbir Kumar, R/o Ranbir College Road, Bhalla Basti, Sangrur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SnapdealSnapdea...
Case Number: 537
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2017
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC-554/16 D.O.O- 24.03.2017Present :- Shri Tek Chand Arora complainant in person. Ms. Bhawana advocate for OP-1. Counsel for OP-3 OP-2 exparte. In view for separate joint statement of Shri Tek Chand Arora complainant and Ms. Bhawana advocate for opposite party no.1 of even d...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/15/3171. Jothy lekshmiKulathoor,Tvpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SnapdealNehru place market,New delhi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Shri P.Sudhir PRESIDENTHO...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 08-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 04-02-2017
Court Name: Purbi Singhbhum
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Mr. D. Rajesh Patnaik and Ruby Prasad
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/88/2013( Date of Filing : 28 Oct 2013 )1. Santosh Kumar SharmaQr.No-19 , L4 Cross road , Agrico , JamshedpurPurbi SinghbhumJharkhand...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Snapdeal240, Ground Floor , Okhla Indusrtial Estate Phase II , New DelhiDelh...
Case Number: 88
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2019
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST)GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI150-151, Community Centre, C-Block, Janak Puri, New Delhi – 110058 Date of institution :17.10.16Complaint Case No. 671/16 Date of order :14.12.16 In the matter of :Manoj Kumar Complainant Vs.SNAPDEAL....
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2017
Court Name: Paschim Midnapore
Appelant Advocate Mr. Rabindranath Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPASCHIM MEDINIPUR.Bibekananda Pramanik, President,Mrs. Debi Sengupta, MemberandKapot Kumar ChattopadhyayComplaint Case No.125/2016Sri Ranendra Manna S/o-Radhakrishna Manna,Vill-Mahatabpur, P.O.-Midnapore, P.S.-Kotwali,Dist-Paschim Medinip...
Case Number: 125
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Snapdeal in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Snapdeal ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Snapdeal under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.