Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate GAURAV SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Execution Application No.:03 of 2020Date of Institution:23.01.2020Date of Decision:09.03.2020Deepak Swami son of Late Shri Tota Ram, Resident of House NO. 900, B/1, Ratpur Colony, Pinjore, Tehsil Kalka, District Pan...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 12-03-2020
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:144 of 2019Date of Institution:20.03.2019Date of Decision:17.02.20201] Sudhir Kumar Sharma son of Sh.Ishwar Chandra, Resident of House No.1267-A, Sector 20-B, Chandigarh.2] Anmol Attry (to t...
Case Number: 144
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2020
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
BANGALORE URBAN DIST.CONSUMERDISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,8TH FLOOR,BWSSB BLDG.K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE560 009Complaint Case No. CC/16/905( Date of Filing : 28 Jun 2016 )1. Ramprasad Shirankallu1604, 16th A Main, 2nd Phase, J.P. Nagar Bangalore 560078...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Snapd...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2019
Court Name: Kurukshetra
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Akhil Bhasin
Aman Garg Vs Snapdeal India. Present: None for decree-holder. Sh. Akhil Bhasin, Advocate for JD No.1. Case called up several times since morning, but none has come present today on behalf of decree-holder. It is already 3.45 P.M. No Intimation is received regarding the non-ap...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2019
Court Name: Allahabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/221/2018स्वतन्त्र कुमार प्रजापतिVs.Snapdeal IndiaBEFORE:JUDGES Sukh Lal PRESIDENTSuman Pandey MEMBERFor the Complainant:For the Opp. Party:Dated : 20 Aug 2019Order20.08.2019 पेश हु...
Case Number: 221
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-08-2019
Court Name: Fatehgarh Sahib
Appelant Advocate Sh. G.S.Nararwal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressel ForumFatehgarh Sahib,Complaint Case No. CC/68/2017( Date of Filing : 01 Nov 2017 )1. Hardeep Singh S/o Ajaib Singh, R/o Near Bawa Nursing HOme, Ward No.2, Bassi Pathana,Fatehgarh SahibPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Snapdeal CorporateH...
Case Number: 68
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2019
Court Name: Kurukshetra
Appelant Advocate Vikrant Kundu
Respondant Advocate
Arpit versus Snapdeal etc.Present:Sh. Vikrant Kundu, Advocate for complainant. Sh. Rakesh Arora, Advocate for Op No.1. Sh. Ravinder Pal Singh , Advocate for Op No.2.Learned counsel for the complainant has made a statement that he withdraws the present complaint due to technical g...
Case Number: 56
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2019
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110001Case No.C.C./174/2018 Dated:In the matter of:Sh. Bharat Seth S/o Sh. Anan...
Case Number: 174
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-01-2019
Court Name: Kurukshetra
Appelant Advocate Amit Sharma
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KURUKSHETRA. Complaint Case No.33 of 2018. Date of institution: 19.02.2018. Date of decision:01.01.2019.Aman Garg S/o Sh. Rajpal Garg, R/o House No.294, Sector-13, City Kurukshetra State Haryana. …Complainant. Versu...
Case Number: 33
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-01-2019
Court Name: Kalahandi
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KALAHANDINEAR TV CENTRE PADA BHAWANIPATANA KALAHANDI ODISHA PIN 766001Complaint Case No. CC/57/2018( Date of Filing : 10 Aug 2018 )1. Sunil Kumar MundA-1 Kumar House,Kalimandirpada At/Po/Ps-Bhawanipatna,KalahandiOdisha...........Complain...
Case Number: 57
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Snapdeal in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Snapdeal ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Snapdeal under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.