
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MAHESH B. CHHIBBER
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL EXECUTION NO. 16 OF 2020(Against the Order dated 23/01/2020 in Complaint No. 347/2017 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. SAMAR ESTATES PVT. LTD. & ANR.THROUGH MR. VINOD BAGAI, S/O. SH. NAND LAL, DIRECTOR/AUTHORI...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2020
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2020
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VIKAS JAIN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.607 of 2017Date of the Institution:26.09.2017Date of Decision: 15.01.20201. Gaurav Jindal S/o Shri Lalit KumarJindal, aged 37 years;2. Smt. Leela Jindal W/o Shri Lalit Kumar Jindal, aged 59 years;Both r...
Case Number: 607
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2020
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ARVIND CHAUHAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No. : 61 of 2017 Date of Institution : 06.02.2017 Date of Decision : 11.03.2019Usha Kumari W/o Sh. Madan Lal2. Madan Lal S/o Sh. Parkash ChandBoth residents of House No. 1257, Sector-11, Panchkula. &hellip...
Case Number: 61
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ARVIND CHAUHAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.392 of 2016Date of the Institution:14.12.2016Date of Decision: 03.07.2018Kanchan W/o Sh.Vijander SinghVijander Singh S/o Sh.Hari ChandBoth residents of House No.213, Adarsh Nagar Pipliwana Town Manimajra...
Case Number: 392
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.B.BAGGA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No. 85 of 2018 Date of the Institution: 16.02.2018 Date of Decision: 30.05.2018Shiv Rattan Goel son of Shri Ashok Kumar Goyal, aged about 30 years, resident of House No.1089, Sector-18, Chandigarh.&h...
Case Number: 85
|
Date of Filing: 21-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-06-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VINOD GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No. 28 of 2018 Date of the Institution: 16.01.2018 Date of Decision: 09.03.20181. Rajnish Chawla son of Kharaiti Lal Chawla, resident of House No.1119/6B-XI, Mohinder Nagar, Near Manav Chowk, Ambala ...
Case Number: 28
|
Date of Filing: 16-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 12-03-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MAHESH B. CHHIBBER
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 280 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 28/08/2017 in Complaint No. 120/2017 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SAMAR ESTATES PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS MAANGING DIRECTOR. R/O. #87, SECTOR-7.PANCHKULA............Appe...
Case Number: 280
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.B.BAGGA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No. 821 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 18.12.2017 Date of Decision: 24.01.2018[Shiv Rattan Goel son of Shri Ashok Kumar Goyal, aged about 30 years, resident of House No.1089, Sector-18, Chandigarh.&h...
Case Number: 821
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate RAJNI NARULA
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Complaint Case No.:39 of 2017Date of Institution:17.02.2017Date of Decision:20.02.2017Ankit Singla S/o Darshan Kumar Singla, R/o House No.652, Sector 21, Panchkula (Haryana). ….ComplainantVersus1. M/s Sam...
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ARVIND CHAUHAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No. 255 of 2016 Date of the Institution: 01.09.2016 Date of Decision: 30.01.20171. Usha Kumari wife of Shri Madan Lal,2. Madan Lal son of Shri Parkash Chand, Both residents of House No.1257, Sector 1...
Case Number: 255
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Samar Estates in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Samar Estates ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Samar Estates under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.