
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Jindal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT Complaint No : 93Date of Institution : 20.03.2017Date of Decision : 15.01.2019Jaskaran Singh aged about 40 years s/o Darshan Singh, r/o Village Rameana, Jaitu, Tehsil Jaitu District Faridkot. ...ComplainantVersusPunjab State Po...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-02-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Jindal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT Complaint No : 94 of 2017Date of Institution : 20.03.2017Date of Decision : 15.01.2019Amrik Singh aged about 37 years s/o Balwinder Singh, r/o Village Rameana, Jaitu, Tehsil Jaitu District Faridkot. ...ComplainantVersusPunjab S...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-02-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ranjit Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT C. C. No : 13Date of Institution : 2.02.2018Date of Decision : 15.01.2019Kulwant Singh, aged about 43 years, s/o Kala Singh, r/o Jiwan Basti, Tibbi Sahib Road, Jaitu, Tehsil Jaitu District Faridkot. ...ComplainantVersusPunjab ...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-11-2020
Court Name: Nawanshahr
Appelant Advocate Gulshan Rana
Respondant Advocate P.K Dhir
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM SHAHEED BHAGAT SINGH NAGAR.Consumer Complaint No : 14 of 2017Date of Institution : 06.04.2017Date of Decision : 11.01.2019Vikas Sharma (age about 40 years) S/o Surinder Sharma R/o Ward No.12, Balachaur, District SBS Nagar. ….C...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-01-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ranjit Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT Complaint No : 371Date of Institution : 20.11.2017Date of Decision : 7.01.2019Amanpreet Singh aged about 45 years s/o Ajaib Singh, s/o Harnam Singh r/o Village Bargari Tehsil Jaitu, District Faridkot. ......ComplainantVersusPun...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-11-2020
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ranjit Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT CC No : 174 of 2017Date of Institution : 02.06.2017Date of Decision : 02.01.2019Jalwant Singh aged about 89 years s/o Mehar Singh r/o Bir Sikhan Wala, Tehsil Kotkapura, District Faridkot. Mobile No. 94170-79719. ...Complainant...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-11-2020
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Sh Rajiv Lohatbadi
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,PatialaPatialaComplaint Case No. CC/17/61( Date of Filing : 23 Feb 2017 )1. Rajinder Singhaged 48 yrs s/o late sh ram chand r/o Khaioda Mohala sanaur patialapunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCLthe mall Patiala through its MDPATI...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-12-2018
Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali
Appelant Advocate Jaspreet Kaur
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/339/2017( Date of Filing : 08 May 2017 )1. Usha Raniaged about 39 years W/o Sh. Randeep Singh, R/o Village Jhenjheri, Tehsil Kgharar, Distt. Mohali............Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCLthrough its Chairman, The Mall Road Patiala.2. The Xen ...
Case Number: 339
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-01-2019
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Deepak Dass
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, Court Room No.19, Block-C,Judicial Court Complex, BATHINDA-151001 (PUNJAB)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/17/51( Date of Filing : 23 Feb 2017 )1. Ram LalLehra Dhur, Teh nathana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCLThe Mall, Bat...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2018
Court Name: Hoshiarpur
Appelant Advocate Sh. Malkiat Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, HOSHIARPUR.DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX ROOM NO. 323 3RD FLOOR.PHONE NO. 01882-221522.Complaint Case No. CC/18/146( Date of Filing : 17 Sep 2018 )1. Sunita Raniw/o Jaswinder Singh r/o Mohalla Rakogia, Badala Tehsil Dasuya, Distt. Hos...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 06-06-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pspcl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pspcl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Pspcl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.