
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ajit Pal Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT C. C. No : 30 of 2018Date of Institution : 8.03.2018Date of Decision : 9.04.2019Nirmala Devi aged about 60 years w/o Parkash Singh r/o Sadiq Road, Near Sheller, Hargobind Nagar Basti, Faridkot, Tehsil and District Faridkot. ......
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Handa
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT C. C. No : 103 of 2018Date of Institution : 14.06.2018Date of Decision : 8.04.2019Gurdev Singh aged about 61 years s/o Pritam Singh, r/o House No.97, Guru Teg Bahader Nagar, Faridkot. ...ComplainantVersusChairman / Managing Di...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 14-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate gursharan kaur and sukhdeep kaur
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB, CHANDIGARH.First Appeal No.642 of 2018 Date of institution : 16.11.2018Reserved on : 01.04.2019 Date of decision : 08.04.2019Punjab State Power Corporation Limited through its Chairman, The Mall, Patiala.Punjab State Power Co...
Case Number: 642
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2018
|
Date of Upload: 30-04-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Kulinder Singh Sekhon
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT C. C. No : 37 of 2018Date of Institution : 13.03.2018Date of Decision : 3.04.2019Sadhu Singh aged about 42 years s/o Jalour Singh r/o Village Thathi Bai Tehsil Baghapurara, District Moga. ...ComplainantVersusPunjab State Po...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-05-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ranjit Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT C. C. No : 14 of 2018Date of Institution : 2.02.2018Date of Decision : 3.04.2019Gurdeep Kaur aged about 55 years w/o late Major Singh son of Pala Singh r/o Kothe Lal Singh Wale, Chaina Road, Jaitu, Tehsil Jaitu District Faridko...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-05-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ashu Mittal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT C. C. No : 391 of 2017Date of Institution : 11.12.2017Date of Decision : 1.04.2019Jaspal Singh aged about 56 years s/o Joginder Singh, r/o Village Kameana, Tehsil and District Faridkot. ......ComplainantVersusAssistant Executiv...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-05-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Jatinder Marria
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT C. C. No : 363 of 2017Date of Institution : 8.11.2017Date of Decision : 1.04.2019Jeetender Kumar aged about 39 years s/o Ved Parkash r/o Airport Road, Opp. Central School, Faridkot. ...ComplainantVersusPunjab State Power Corpo...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-05-2019
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate Sh Avtar Singh Pandher
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMMANSAPUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/18/94( Date of Filing : 11 Jun 2018 )1. Chand SinghS/o Jeeta Singh urf jeet Singh Village Berawala Dogra Police Station Boha Tehsil BudhladaMansaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCLSDO PSPCL Boha ...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2019
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate Sh Avtar Singh Pandher
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMMANSAPUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/18/112( Date of Filing : 17 Jul 2018 )1. Chand Singhaged about 9p years son Jeeta Singh uraf Jeet Singh Village Berawala Dogra police station Boha Tehsil BudhladaMansaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 17-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ranjit Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT C. C. No : 67 of 2018Date of Institution : 17.04.2018Date of Decision : 20.03.2019Shanti Devi aged about 59 years w/o Hari Chand r/o Street No. 6, House No.55, Guru Nanak Colony, Tehsil and District Faridkot. ...ComplainantVer...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-05-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pspcl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pspcl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Pspcl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.