
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Manohar Lal Mukhi
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, Court Room No.19, Block-C,Judicial Court Complex, BATHINDA-151001 (PUNJAB)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/18/153( Date of Filing : 06 Jun 2018 )1. Sudesh RaniAged about 55 years WD/o of Sh. Saroop Chand R/o village seikhu teh. T...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 20-02-2019
Court Name: Mansa
Appelant Advocate Sh Satish Kumar Singla
Respondant Advocate Sh Dinesh Kumar
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMMANSAPUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/18/57( Date of Filing : 02 Apr 2018 )1. Ved ParkashS/o Ronak Ram S/o Leelu Ram R/o near Under Bridge Ram Bagh Road MansaMANSAPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCLthrough its Sub Divisional Officers...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Iqbal Kaushal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT Complaint No : 347 of 2017Date of Institution : 25.10.2017Date of Decision : 4.02.2019Talwinderjeet Singh aged about 22 years s/o Lakhwinder Singh Sandhu son of Shabeg Singh Sandhu, r/o Bhan Singh Colony, Street No.2, District ...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Amit Mittal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT Complaint No : 330 of 2017 Date of Institution : 4.10.2017 Date of Decision : 4.02.2019Sham Sunder aged about 60 years son of Kishan Chand resident of Old Cantt Road, Opposite Petrol Pump, Faridko...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-11-2020
Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali
Appelant Advocate Davinder Kumar
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/62/2017( Date of Filing : 27 Jan 2017 )1. Neem Chand SharmaS/o Sh. Sadhu Ram Sharma, R/o H.No.386, Swastik Vihar, Pabhat, Tehsil Dera Bassi, Distt. Mohali............Complainant(s)Versus1. PSPCLthrough its Chairman, The Mall Patiala.2. PSPCLt...
Case Number: 62
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Parmjeet Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT Complaint No : 2 of 2018Date of Institution : 3.01.2018Date of Decision : 16.01.2019Bikkar Singh aged about 55 years s/o Balbir Singh r/o Village Dhilwan Kalan, Tehsil Kotkapura District Faridkot. ...ComplainantVersusJunior ...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Ranjit Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT C. C. No : 13Date of Institution : 2.02.2018Date of Decision : 15.01.2019Kulwant Singh, aged about 43 years, s/o Kala Singh, r/o Jiwan Basti, Tibbi Sahib Road, Jaitu, Tehsil Jaitu District Faridkot. ...ComplainantVersusPunjab ...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-11-2020
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Jindal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT Complaint No : 94 of 2017Date of Institution : 20.03.2017Date of Decision : 15.01.2019Amrik Singh aged about 37 years s/o Balwinder Singh, r/o Village Rameana, Jaitu, Tehsil Jaitu District Faridkot. ...ComplainantVersusPunjab S...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-02-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Jindal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT Complaint No : 93Date of Institution : 20.03.2017Date of Decision : 15.01.2019Jaskaran Singh aged about 40 years s/o Darshan Singh, r/o Village Rameana, Jaitu, Tehsil Jaitu District Faridkot. ...ComplainantVersusPunjab State Po...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-02-2019
Court Name: Faridkot
Appelant Advocate Dinesh Jindal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, FARIDKOT Complaint No : 92 of 2017Date of Institution : 20.03.2017Date of Decision : 15.01.2019Gurwinder Singh aged about 21 years s/o Nirmal Singh r/o Rameana, Jaitu, Tehsil Jaitu District Faridkot. ...ComplainantVersusPunjab State Pow...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-02-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Pspcl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Pspcl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Pspcl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.