company-name-logo

Post Office

Latest Judgments

Total 3344 Consumer Court Cases Against Post Office.

Delhi

SAYYEDA MADIHA V/S POST OFFICE (EAST) SSPO

Post Office  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986) Date of Decision:24.08.2016First Appeal No. 326/2012(Arising out of the order dated 15.02.2012 passed in Complaint Case No. 204/2011 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 16-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 05-09-2016

Haryana

Assistant Superintendent of Post office V/S Baljeet Singh s/o Sh.Mansa Ram,

Post Office  

Court Name: Yamunanagar

Appelant Advocate None for complainant.

Respondant Advocate Sushil Garg OP NO.1 &2,NOne for Op No.3

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, YAMUNA NAGAR Complaint No. 1194 of 2010. Date of institution: 17.12.2010 Date of decision: 24.08.2016.Baljeet Singh aged about 33 years son of Sh. Mansa Ram, resident of village Mandebar, Post Office Aurangabad, Tehsil Ja...

Case Number: 1194

|

Date of Filing: 17-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 02-09-2016

Delhi

KAROL BAGH POST OFFICE V/S SH. DAYA RAM

Post Office  

Court Name: Central Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/28/20141. SH. DAYA RAMR/0 VPO MEEKAS ,TEN BHADRA DISTT. HANUMANGARH 335501 (RAJ)...........Complainant(s)Versus1. KAROL BAGH POST OFFICEKAROL BAGH POST OFFICE GURDWARA ROAD KAROL BAGH N.D. 5............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. MOHD. AN...

Case Number: 28

|

Date of Filing: 03-02-2014

|

Date of Upload: 17-10-2016

Karnataka

The Superintendent of Post Office, Head Post Office and another V/S Sri Mahadevappa B Honnappanavar

Post Office  

Court Name: Gadag

Appelant Advocate D.M Nadaf

Respondant Advocate

JUDGEMENT DELIVERED BY SMT.C.H.SAMIUNNISA ABRAR, PRESIDENT:The complainant has filed this Complaint against the Opposite Parties (herein after referred in short as OPs) u/s 12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleging deficiency in service against OPs.2. The brief fact of the cas...

Case Number: 3

|

Date of Filing: 12-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 30-08-2016

West Bengal

Post Master, Gankar Sub Post Office & Others V/S Sanjoy Das

Post Office  

Court Name: Murshidabad

Appelant Advocate Mr. Partha Sarathi Ghosh & Mrs. Shirina Parvin

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumBerhampore, Murshidabad.Complaint Case No. CC/15/20161. Sanjoy DasS/O- Dinabandhu Das, Vill- Mirjapur, PO- Gankar, PS- Raghunathganj, Pin- 742227MurshidabadWest Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Post Master, Gankar Sub Post Office &...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 25-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 19-08-2016

Uttar Pradesh

INDIAN POST OFFICE V/S PAWAN KUMAR

Indian Post   Post Office  

Court Name: Muradabad-I

Appelant Advocate MR. DHARMVEER SINGH

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 28-01-2015

|

Date of Upload: 02-03-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Post Office V/S Lakshya Jan Chetana Samiti

Post Office  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate A.N.soni & S.K.Shukla

Respondant Advocate -

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2014/1648(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Lakshya Jan Chetana Samiti-...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Post Of...

Case Number: 2014

|

Date of Filing: 25-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 29-09-2016

West Bengal

The Post Master, Sarat Bose Post Office V/S Ranajit Nath

Post Office  

Court Name: Kolkata-III(South)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT-III(South),West Bengal18, Judges Court Road, Kolkata 700027Complaint Case No. CC/21/20161. Ranajit Nath16/D,Pandita Road, Kolkata-29............Complainant(s)Versus1. The Post Master, Sarat Bose Post Office211, Sarat Bose Road, Kolkata...

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 15-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-08-2016

Madhya Pradesh

POST OFFICE V/S SMT.MEENA KHARE

Post Office  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPALPLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 1596 OF 2014(Arising out of order dated 12.09.2013 passed in C.C. No. 59/2012 by the District Forum, Panna) SMT. MEENA KHARE. … APPELLANT.VersusPOST MASTER, POST OFF...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 09-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 29-07-2016

Chandigarh

Post Office V/S Hakumat Rai

Post Office  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/758/2015Date of Institution:10/11/2015Date of Decision:18/07/2016Hakumat Rai S/o Late Sh. Kirpa Ram, R/o H.No. 2182, Ground Floor, Sector 45-C, Chandigarh.…..ComplainantV E R S U...

Case Number: 758

|

Date of Filing: 10-11-2015

|

Date of Upload: 02-08-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Post Office in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Post Office ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Post Office under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.