
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate M.H.Muhammed Basheer
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. CC/21/513( Date of Filing : 03 Dec 2021 )1. Bineetha.C.I-...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic-............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. C.T.Sabu PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Sreeja.S MEMBER PRESENT:M.H.Muh...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2021
|
Date of Upload: 21-03-2022
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/29/2022( Date of Filing : 19 Jan 2022 )1. DR.H.saleemtvpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic Indiatvpm............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V...
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2022
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2022
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/353/2021Date of Institution:28/05/2021Date of Decision:04/02/2022Virender Kumar, S/o Late Sh.Gopal Singh, Resident of H.No.551, Sector-11B, Chandigarh.… ComplainantV E R S U SPanason...
Case Number: 353
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2021
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2022
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Parveen Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh. Parmod Kumar
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/19/26( Date of Filing : 15 Jan 2019 )1. Naveen KumarS/o Sh. Kapur Chand R/o 1004-A/19, Shakti Nagar, Green Road, Rohtak. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic IndiaPvt Ltd. 12th Floor, Amb...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2022
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate SIDDHARTH S. HARKULKAR.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI SUBURBAN NEW ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR, OPP.DR.BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR GARDEN , BANDRA (EAST), DISTRICT-MUMBAI SUBURBAN -400 051, MAHARASHTRA.Complaint Case No. CC/118/2018( Date of Filing : 20 Mar 2018 )1. MR. AMJAD KHA...
Case Number: 118
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 13-01-2022
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Bhaskar Bhalla
Respondant Advocate Vikas Yadav
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No. 309 of 2020 Date of instt.21.08.2020 Date of Decision 15.12.2021Jasvinder Singh aged 43 years son of Shri Gurdial Singh resident of 4199/1138A, Gali no.8, Shiv Colony, Karnal. ……....
Case Number: 309
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2020
|
Date of Upload: 24-12-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K. JAyaraman and N. Indhumathi
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003. BEFORE Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI MEMBERF.A. No.14/2015(Against the order in C.C. No.14/2013, dated:11.04.2014 on the ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2022
Court Name: North 24 Parganas
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DCDRF North 24 Paraganas BarasatKolkata-700126.Miscellaneous Application No. MA/69/2020( Date of Filing : 12 Mar 2020 )InComplaint Case No. CC/768/20161. Sri Sandip Paul, S/o Jyotirmoy Paul, ............Appellant(s)Versus1. Panasonic India Pvt Ltd. and ors.............Respondent(...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2020
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2023
Court Name: Patiala
Appelant Advocate Sh Lovdeep Singh Saini
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,PatialaPatialaComplaint Case No. CC/19/137( Date of Filing : 18 Apr 2019 )1. Kulwant SinghR/O Of House No 225 Near gurudawara Sahib Charan Bagh PatialaPatialaPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S Panasonic India PVT LTDSPIC Buildin...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2019
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2021
Court Name: Balangir
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM. BOLANGIRODISHAComplaint Case No. CC/51/2020( Date of Filing : 28 Dec 2020 )1. Abhimanyu MeherAt/Po:- kutmunda Ps:- PatnagarhBolangirOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Panasonic India , Head quarters Located in Bhubaneswar .Corpo...
Case Number: 51
|
Date of Filing: 28-12-2020
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2022
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panasonic in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panasonic ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Panasonic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.