company-name-logo

Panasonic

Latest Judgments

Total 581 Consumer Court Cases Against Panasonic.

Assam

Panasonic India Private Limited, Represented by its Managing Director V/S Sri Anil Sharma

Panasonic  

Court Name: Kamrup

Appelant Advocate SRI. SIDDHARTH SANCHETI

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSU0MER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONKAMRUP,GUWAHATIComplaint Case No. CC/41/2013( Date of Filing : 06 Apr 2013 )1. Sri Anil SharmaS/O- Sri Bimal Kumar Sharma,H.No-16, 2nd floor, Prabhat Apartment,Rehabari,Guwahati-781008,Assam...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasoni...

Case Number: 41

|

Date of Filing: 06-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-12-2022

Delhi

PANASONIC V/S AKASH

Panasonic  

Court Name: West Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-III (WEST)C-150-151, COMMUNITY CENTRE, JANAKPURI,NEW DELHI-110058CASE NO. 234/2021IN THE MATTERS OF:-Akash ……COMPLAINANTVERSUSPanasonic ……OPPOSITE PARTYCoram:SONICA MEHROTRA (PRESIDENT)RICHA JINDAL (M...

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 13-07-2021

|

Date of Upload: 07-12-2022

Haryana

PANASONIC INDIA PVT LTD V/S UMESH PANDEY

Panasonic  

Court Name: Faridabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Distic forum Faridabad, hariyanafaridabadfinal orderComplaint Case No. CC/271/2022( Date of Filing : 21 May 2022 )1. UMESH PANDEYHOUSE NO 554 SECTOR 37 GURUGRAMHARYANA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PANASONIC INDIA PVT LTD12TH FLOOR, AMBIENCE TOWER AMBIENCE ISLAND, NH-8 GURGAON...

Case Number: 271

|

Date of Filing: 21-05-2022

|

Date of Upload: 18-11-2022

Haryana

Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd., V/S Khushi Ram Jakhar

Panasonic  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Digvijay Jakhar

Respondant Advocate Sh. Yoginder Singh Dalal

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/20/346( Date of Filing : 07 Sep 2020 )1. Khushi Ram JakharS/o Sh. Hari Singh, R/o A92, Preet Vihar, Rohtak-124001............Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd.,12th Floor, Ambience...

Case Number: 20

|

Date of Filing: 07-09-2020

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2022

Maharashtra

PANASONIC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHRS. V/S RAJINDER RISHI.

Panasonic  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate ADV. AKASH MENON.

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI SUBURBAN NEW ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR, OPP.DR.BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR GARDEN , BANDRA (EAST), DISTRICT-MUMBAI SUBURBAN -400 051, MAHARASHTRA.Complaint Case No. CC/283/2018( Date of Filing : 24 Jul 2018 )1. RAJINDER RISH...

Case Number: 283

|

Date of Filing: 24-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 18-08-2022

Maharashtra

Divisional Manager Panasonic India Pvt Ltd Mumbai V/S Shri Deepak Stynarayan Kedarpawar At chandrapur

Panasonic  

Court Name: Chandrapur

Appelant Advocate Adv.Khobragade

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION CHANDRAPURComplaint Case No. CC/18/104( Date of Filing : 11 Jul 2018 )1. Shri Deepak Stynarayan Kedarpawar At chandrapurAt Near Bhangaram Mandir Bhiwapur Ward Lalpeth chandrapur chandrapurmaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ...

Case Number: 18

|

Date of Filing: 11-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 07-07-2022

Kerala

Panasonic Company Manager V/S Vinesh.P

Panasonic  

Court Name: Kannur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKANNURComplaint Case No. CC/164/2020( Date of Filing : 18 Aug 2020 )1. Vinesh.PPadmavilasam,Iriveri.P.O,Pin-670613............Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic Company ManagerPanasonic India Private Limited,12th Floor,Ambience Tower,Ambience...

Case Number: 164

|

Date of Filing: 18-08-2020

|

Date of Upload: 18-06-2022

Delhi

PANASONIC HEAD OFFICE V/S MANOJ KR.

Panasonic   Manoj  

Court Name: East Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Convenient Shopping Centre, Saini Enclave, DELHI -110092DELHI EASTComplaint Case No. CC/161/2020( Date of Filing : 29 Sep 2020 )1. MANOJ KR.MAYUR VIHAR, PHASE-I, DELHI-91...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PANASONIC HEAD OFFICEGURGAON, HARYANA.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BL...

Case Number: 161

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2020

|

Date of Upload: 17-05-2022

Chandigarh

Panasonic Brand Shop, Ideal Electronic V/S Prem Singh

Panasonic   Electronic  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Appeal No:A/258/2019Date of Institution:29/10/2019Date of Decision:22/04/2022Prem Singh son of Sh.Shiv Dhan, Resident of House No.524, Beer Gagar, Panchkula (Haryana).…. AppellantV E R S U S1. Panason...

Case Number: 258

|

Date of Filing: 25-10-2019

|

Date of Upload: 02-05-2022

Uttar Pradesh

PANASONIC CO. V/S RAJESH SHARMA

Panasonic  

Court Name: Azamgarh

Appelant Advocate PARAS NATH TIWARI

Respondant Advocate

जिला उपभोक्ता विवाद प्रतितोष आयोग- आजमगढ़।परिवाद संख्या 03 सन् 2016प्रस्तुति दिनांक 14.01.2016 नि�...

Case Number: 3

|

Date of Filing: 14-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 01-04-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panasonic in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panasonic ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Panasonic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.