company-name-logo

Panasonic

Latest Judgments

Total 581 Consumer Court Cases Against Panasonic.

Punjab

M/s Panasonic India Pvt.Ltd., V/S Mukhjinder Pal Singh Sidhu S/o Sh. Mangal Singh

Panasonic  

Court Name: Jalandhar

Appelant Advocate Sukhraj Singh

Respondant Advocate

Distt Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionLadowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/157/2024( Date of Filing : 29 Apr 2024 )1. Mukhjinder Pal Singh Sidhu S/o Sh. Mangal SinghR/o Village Nangal Shama, P.O. La...

Case Number: 157

|

Date of Filing: 29-04-2024

|

Date of Upload: 07-08-2024

Himachal Pradesh

Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. V/S Sh. Puran Singh.

Panasonic  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Dhiraj Kanwar.

Respondant Advocate Mr. Deepak Sabharwal.

Case Number: 49

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2020

|

Date of Upload: 25-07-2024

Haryana

M/s Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. V/S Ravi Bhushan

Panasonic  

Court Name: Gurgaon

Appelant Advocate Sh. Birender Yadav

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1024

|

Date of Filing: 03-11-2023

|

Date of Upload: 17-07-2024

Himachal Pradesh

Panasonic Life Solutions V/S Subhash Mohan Snehi

Panasonic  

Court Name: Shimla

Appelant Advocate Bhavinta

Respondant Advocate OP Ex-parte

Case Number: 123

|

Date of Filing: 02-06-2023

|

Date of Upload: 11-07-2024

Uttar Pradesh

PANASONIC UNIQUE SERVICES V/S ROHIT CHAWLA

Panasonic  

Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSIONGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/361/2024( Date of Filing : 12 May 2024 )1. ROHIT CHAWLAA-704 ROYAL COURT SECTOR-16 GREATER NOIDA WESTGAUTAM BUDDHA NAGARUTTAR PRADESH...........Complainant(s)Vers...

Case Number: 361

|

Date of Filing: 12-05-2024

|

Date of Upload: 09-07-2024

Punjab

Panasonic Smart Factory Solutions India (Division Company of Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd.) V/S Gaurav Joshi

Panasonic  

Court Name: Firozpur

Appelant Advocate Devesh Kakkar

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 130

|

Date of Filing: 12-05-2022

|

Date of Upload: 13-06-2024

Delhi

PANASONIC LIFE SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED V/S DXC TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

Panasonic  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 584

|

Date of Filing: 28-02-2024

|

Date of Upload: 29-05-2024

Uttar Pradesh

PANASONIC INDIA V/S AJAY SINGH

Panasonic  

Court Name: Bareilly-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

1. डिक्रीदार अनुपस्थित। 2. निर्णीत ऋणी अनिर्वाहित। 3. पैरवी के अभाव में निर्णीत ऋणी को नोटिस जारी नहीं। 4. दिना�...

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 25-02-2019

|

Date of Upload: 20-04-2024

Delhi

PANASONIC INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS V/S MS.REENA

Panasonic  

Court Name: North West

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION-V, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Review Application No. RA/5/2024( Date of Filing : 11 Jan 2024 )InComplaint Case No. CC/1086/20151. MS.REENAV.P.O. BHADANA,DISTRICT SONIPAT,HARYANA...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 11-01-2024

|

Date of Upload: 01-04-2024

West Bengal

Panasonic India Pvt Ltd. and ors. V/S Sri Sandip Paul, S/o Jyotirmoy Paul,

Panasonic  

Court Name: North 24 Parganas

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DCDRC North 24 Paraganas BarasatKolkata-700126.Complaint Case No. CC/768/2016( Date of Filing : 26 Dec 2016 )1. Sri Sandip Paul, S/o Jyotirmoy Paul, 50E/1, K N C Rd Nayan Kanan Barasat, Po and PS- Barasat, Kol-124............Complainant(s)Versus1. Panasonic India Pvt Ltd. and ors...

Case Number: 768

|

Date of Filing: 26-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 02-04-2024

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Panasonic in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Panasonic ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Panasonic under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.