company-name-logo

Mi

Latest Judgments

Total 134 Consumer Court Cases Against Mi.

Haryana

MI Service Center V/S Sonia

Mi  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Rinku Jangra

Respondant Advocate Sh. Kunal Juneja

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 329/2017( Date of Filing : 02 Jun 2017 )1. SoniaD/o Anand Pana Mailwan, VPO Bohar District Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. MI Service Center2063, Delhi Road, Model Town, Rohtak. 2. Xiao...

Case Number: 329

|

Date of Filing: 02-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 01-07-2019

Karnataka

XIAOMI MI TECHNOLOGY INDIA PVT LTD V/S P.Sivakumar

Xiaomi   Mi  

Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional

Appelant Advocate Complainant In Person

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM , I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27Complaint Case No. CC/1533/2018( Date of Filing : 18 Sep 2018 )1. P.SivakumarAged about 45 years, No:C204, Br...

Case Number: 1533

|

Date of Filing: 18-09-2018

|

Date of Upload: 25-05-2019

Haryana

MI Service Center JMD Communication V/S Rajeev Sharma

Mi  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Abhishek Nagpal

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint no. 341 of 2018 Date of instt.: 04.12.2018 Date of Decision 14.03.2019Rajeev Sharma son of Shri Jagdish Chand resident of village Sambhli, Tehsil Nissing District Karnal.UID no.368568150639 ….....

Case Number: 341

|

Date of Filing: 04-12-2018

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2019

Delhi

MI EXCLUSIVE SERVICE CENTER V/S GIRISH BUTTAN

Mi  

Court Name: East Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, FIRST FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI – 110 092C.C. NO. 276/16Shri Girish ButtanHouse No. 67, GRD NagarStreet No. 4, Laxmi NagarDelhi – 110 092 ….ComplainantVs.MI...

Case Number: 276

|

Date of Filing: 31-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2019

Punjab

Xiaomi Mi Mobile India V/S Krishan Kumar

Xiaomi   Mi  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Sh.Sonu Marken

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR Complaint no. 666 Instituted on: 18.12.2017 Decided on: 13.06.2018Krishan Kumar son of Satpal Singh resident of Bazigar Basti, Ward No.17, S...

Case Number: 666

|

Date of Filing: 18-12-2017

|

Date of Upload: 27-06-2018

Orissa

MI Servuce Centre, Sprimon Technologies V/S Ramakanta Behera

Mi  

Court Name: Sambalpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, SambalpurNear, SBI Main Branch, SambalpurComplaint Case No. CC/48/2017( Date of Filing : 06 Jun 2017 )1. Ramakanta BeheraR/o- sadeipali santoshi maa pada, Po/Ps-Burla,768017SambalpurOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MI Servuce Cen...

Case Number: 48

|

Date of Filing: 06-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 29-01-2019

Haryana

MI Service Center V/S Jasbir Jangra

Mi  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Vivek Kumar

Respondant Advocate Sh. Kunal Juneja

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 426/2017( Date of Filing : 25 Jul 2017 )1. Jasbir Jangra S/o Tejpal R/o VPO Mandi, Tehsil Israna, District Panipat............Complainant(s)Versus1. MI Service CenterInstitute of Law, Rohtak BMC...

Case Number: 426

|

Date of Filing: 25-07-2017

|

Date of Upload: 26-10-2018

Haryana

MI Service Centre NHBC V/S Hari Kishan

Mi  

Court Name: Panipat

Appelant Advocate Sh. Purushotam Sharma

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/17/189( Date of Filing : 04 Aug 2017 )1. Hari KishanAge about 32 years Son of Sh. Randhir R/o Village- Bal Jattan Tehsil MadlaudaPanipatHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MI Service Centre NHBCSector 11-...

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 26-07-2018

Orissa

The CEO., Authorised market place for MI products TVS Electronics ltd.,Bangalore & Others V/S Rajib Lochan Pattnaik

Tvs Electronics   Mi   Tvs  

Court Name: Nabarangapur

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NABARANGPURHeading 2Complaint Case No. CC/85/2017( Date of Filing : 05 Sep 2017 )1. Rajib Lochan PattnaikAt/Vill- Ichabatiguda Po/Ps/Dist nabarangpurNabarangpurOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The CEO., Authorised market place fo...

Case Number: 85

|

Date of Filing: 05-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 31-07-2018

Delhi

DELHI MI EXCLUSIVE V/S ANIL BHARGAV

Mi  

Court Name: West Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL FORUM-III (WEST)C-BLOCK, COMMUNITY CENTRE,PANKHA ROAD, JANAK PURI, NEW DELHIComplaint Case No. CC/16/5971. ANIL BHARGAVC-248,1ST FLOOR,BACK SIDE ENTRY HARI NAGAR,DELHI-64...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DELHI MI EXCLUSIVE2ND FLOOR,JANAK PLACE,CHATRAPA...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 13-02-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mi in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mi ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Mi under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.