Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited
Latest Judgments
Total 72 Consumer Court Cases Against Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited.
M/s Manohar Infrastructure and Constructions Private Limited V/S Bimal Jain
Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate T S Khaira, Adv.
Respondant Advocate I.P.singh, Adv.
After arguing for some-time when confronted with the provision of Clause 35 of the Plot Buyer’s Agreement signed between the parties on 11.04.2016, Counsel for the complainant wishes to withdraw this complaint with liberty to file it again, if need be. Liberty granted. In v...
Case Number: 854
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2018
M/s Manohar Infrastructure and Constructions Private Limited V/S Manish Singla
Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
As per office report, rejoinder alongwith Annexures C-10 to C-13 filed by the complainants in the office of this Commission, which are taken on record. Copies of the same have already been supplied to the Counsel opposite. The matter has amicably been settled between the parties....
Case Number: 166
|
Date of Filing: 17-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2018
M/s Manohar Infrastructure and Constructions Private Limited V/S Ramesh Chand Bassi
Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the Opposite Parties, which is taken on record. The matter has amicably been settled between the parties. It is stated by Sh.I.P.Singh, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties that the principal amount of Rs.22,50,000/- shall be returned to the c...
Case Number: 86
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2018
M/s Manohar Infrastructure and Constructions Private Limited V/S Ramesh Chand Bassi
Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Savinder Singh Gill, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of the Opposite Parties, which is taken on record. The matter has amicably been settled between the parties. It is stated by Sh.I.P.Singh, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties that the principal amount of Rs.22,50,000/- shall be returned to the c...
Case Number: 87
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2018
M/s Manohar Infrastructure and Constructions Private Limited V/S Ashok Kumar Kundu
Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Veer Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Rejoinder not filed. In this case, the complainant is seeking refund of an amount of Rs.29,25,000/- paid by him to the Opposite Party. At the time of arguments, the matter has amicably been settled between the parties. Sh.I.P.Singh, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Party on get...
Case Number: 156
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2018
M/s Manohar Infrastructure and Constructions Private Limited V/S Shivdeep Viveky
Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
As per office report, rejoinder filed by the complainant, which is taken on record. Copy of the same has already been supplied to the Counsel opposite. The matter has amicably been settled between the parties. It is stated by Sh.I.P.Singh, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parti...
Case Number: 80
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2018
M/s Manohar Infrastructure and Constructions Private Limited V/S Biren Bawa
Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Gupta, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
The matter has amicably been settled between the parties. It is stated by Sh.I.P.Singh, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties that the principal amount of Rs.11.10,000/- shall be returned to the complainant in six monthly equated installments of Rs.1,85,000/- each, alongwith...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2018
Manohar Infrastructure and Constructions Private Limited V/S Capt. Harbhajan Singh
Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ravinder Pal Singh Adv. & Dharindra Shukla Adv.
Respondant Advocate
The matter has amicably been settled between the parties. It is stated by Sh.I.P.Singh, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties that the principal amount of Rs.7,20,000/- shall be returned to the complainants alongwith interest @8% p.a. (simple) from the date of respective dep...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 08-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 17-07-2018
M/s Manohar Infrastructure and Constructions Private Limited V/S Raman Sharma
Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shyam Kumar Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:66 of 2018Date of Institution:12.02.2018Date of Decision:02.07.2018Raman Sharma son of Late Harbans Lal Sharma resident of 5718 (A) Sector 38 West Chandigarh.……ComplainantV e r s u sM/s ...
Case Number: 66
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2018
M/s Manohar Infrastructure and Constructions Private Limited V/S Naresh Jagwan
Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shyam Kumar Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:64 of 2018Date of Institution:12.02.2018Date of Decision:02.07.2018Naresh Jagwan son of Sh.S.D. Jagwan, House No.100-A, Ground Floor, Sector 14, Panchkula.……ComplainantV e r s u sM/s Man...
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 12-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Manohar Infrastructure And Constructions Private Limited under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.