
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KHAITAN & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. MAHALING PANDARGE
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3969 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 09/08/2006 in Appeal No. 2234/2005 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LTD.RRACTOR , DIVISION AKURLI ROAD KANDIVALI WEST MUMBAI - 400101...
Case Number: 3969
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2006
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KHAITAN & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. MAHALING PANDARGE
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3970 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 08/09/2006 in Appeal No. 2234/2005 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA LTD.RRACTOR , DIVISION AKURLI ROAD KANDIVALI WEST MUMBAI - 400101...
Case Number: 3970
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2006
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2012
Finance Finance Mahindra And Mahindra
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.C.Raghu, Plot No.103, SBI Colony,
Respondant Advocate Mr.v.Mohan Srnivas
First Appeal No. FA/471/2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/11/2010 in Case No. CC/89/2009 of District ADILABAD)1. Meenam Agaiah, S/o.Balaiah,R/o.H.No.5-634, Indiranagar,Mancherial, Adilabad...........Appellant(s)Versus1. The Finance Manager, Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Service...
Case Number: 471
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate N.K.MOHAN LAL,
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/10/5261. VIDYADHARANVADYARUPARAMBIL, MANNAM PO, VAZHIKULANGARA, MANNAM ROAD, NORTH PARUR. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE MANAGER MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.VYTTILA P.O.KOCHI.2. MET...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K N Shukla
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2011/680(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Mahindra and Mahindra a BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Alok Kumar Bose PRESIDI...
Case Number: 2011
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Devashish Dash
Respondant Advocate M/s. V.Gowrisankar Rao
First Appeal No. FA/688/2010(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/05/2010 in Case No. CC.100 of 2009 of District ADILABAD)1. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., rep. by its Manager (Sales) Farm Equipment Sector, Akurli Road, Kandivali (East) Mumbai. Maharashtra...........Appellant(s)Versus1. 1. ...
Case Number: 688
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms.Chhaya Deo
Respondant Advocate --
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/05/833(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/03/2005 in Case No. 2004/25 of District Satara)1. SMT. SAIDA M. KADVAIKAR SAIDA VILLA, NEAR CUSTOM OFF, CHIPLUN, DIST RATNAGIRI............Ap...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Devinder Singh
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 492 of 2011 1. Avtar SinghR/o # 48/B, Old Ropar Old. Manimajra, UT, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited,through Vivek Sharma, Branch Head, SCO No. 2447-48, FF, S...
Case Number: 492
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shri. N. Y. Gupte & A. N. Gupte
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/06/1438(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/07/2006 in Case No. CC/05/277 of District Solapur)1. M/s. Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd.40/8, Rajlaxmi Complex, Sonhira Chowk...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 02-08-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Solapur
Appelant Advocate Patil
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/1911. punraj changdeo sontakkeR/0 Gavatya maruti chowk Mohol Tal. MoholSolapurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Gandhi motors 2. Mahindra and mahindra p.ltd1.297 kegaon pune satara road solapur2. Jagatap park R.Ambedkar road Tadivala road puneS...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mahindra And Mahindra in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mahindra And Mahindra ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Mahindra And Mahindra under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.