
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K S ACHARYA
Respondant Advocate D B MEHTA
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2015
Court Name: South Chennai
Appelant Advocate B.Gurunathan
Respondant Advocate Anand, Abdula
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)Complaint Case No. 155/20101. S.SanthanamNo.55, Periya Ramasamy Street, Guduvanchery-603202. BEFORE: B.RAMALINGAM., MA., ML., PRESIDENT K.AMALA., M.A., L.L.B., MEMBER THIRU.L.DEENADAYALAN, M.A. B.L MEMBER For the Complain...
Case Number: 155
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 18-03-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A. K. Usmani
Respondant Advocate Mr. Anirban Karmakar
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. FA/812/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/09/2012 in Case No. CC/150/2011 of District Kolkata-I)1. M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.36-38A, Nariman Bhavan, Nariman Point,...
Case Number: 812
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K Shukla
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. FA/13/275(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/04/2013 in Case No. Ea/12/67 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. Ms Smita Pradeep Karwarkar306, Dhiraj Vally Saibaba Complex, Ciba Road Goregaon...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. CHOPRA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1131 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 28/01/2013 in Appeal No. 462/2011 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD. & ANR.HAVING BRANCH OFFICE AT: PLOT NO-4, UNIT NO-101, FIRST FLOO...
Case Number: 1131
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-09-2014
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Unit-1, Kolkata8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site : confonet.nic.inExecution Application No. EA/11/84InComplaint Case No. CC/10/1151. Uttam Sen49B, Surya Sen Street, Kolkata-700009.KolkataWB...........Appellant(s)Versu...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RISHABH SHARMA & MR. AKHIL MODI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2678 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 07/04/2014 in Appeal No. 217/2014 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD.HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT 304 SHYAM ANUKAMPA ASHOK MARG,.C-SCHEME,...
Case Number: 2678
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2014
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/11/1741. Renuka NandakumarNavaneeth, Perukavu P.O, VilavoorkkalTVMKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Manager, Kotak Mahindra Prime LTDVellayambalamTVMKerala.............
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 30-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/13/561. Muhammed SalibIII/305,Panalam,Cherur.P.OKasaragodKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd;3rd floor,Elite Arcade,Chakkarathkulam(Nadakkavu)Kannur Road,Calicutkerala............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE P.RAMADEV...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. PRISTINE COUNCILORS
Respondant Advocate MR MADHURENDRA KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 611 OF 2013 IN RP/2981/20121. M/S. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. KAMAL KUMAR TIWARI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESIDIN...
Case Number: 611
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-10-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak Mahindra Prime in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak Mahindra Prime ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak Mahindra Prime under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.