
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 42 of 2011 1. Varun BediR/o # 134/1, Sector 45/A, Chd. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 02 Sep 201...
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Ish kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjay Goyal,O.P.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Execution Application No. EA/11/21 1. Rajesh Kumar ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd....
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 10-02-2023
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 36 of 2011 1. Varun Bedi R/o 134/1, Sector 45/A, Chd. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.,SCO No. 154-155, 2nd Floor,...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh.R.S.Cheema
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjay Goyal O.P.s.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/10/526 1. Dr.Romesh Kataria ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Kotak Mahindra prime Ltd. ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 16-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate Adv. K Arunkumar kaimal
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/1191. Abdul aseesS/O Muhammedkutty,P.V.House,ChakaramkulamMalapuramKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kotak Mahindra Prime LtdNaikkanal,Thrissur,Rep By Managing directorThrissurKerala............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONORABLE Padmini Sudheesh PRESIDEN...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Solapur
Appelant Advocate Rokade
Respondant Advocate Nagane
1Behind District Treasury Office, Near Central Administrative, Building, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/10/143 1. Madhukar Jagannath BhosaleKalyan nagar Part-2 Majare wadi SolapurSolapurMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd 2. Royal Motors Soharab H...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Sanjay Kasture
Respondant Advocate ADV.S.S.ADKAR
CC/11/1District Consumer Forum, NagpurComplaint Case No. CC/10/355 1. Shri Namdeo Vishwnath KaduNAGPURNAGPURMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.NAGPURNAGPURMAHARASHTRA ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HONABLE MR. V.N.RANE ,PRESIDENTHONABLE MR. MIL...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mohit Gadkari & Co.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/09/5(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/09/2008 in Case No. 281/2007 of District Thane)1. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTDREG. OFF. 36-38 A, NARIMAN BHAVAN, 227, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI 400021 ...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MOHIT GADKARI & CO
Respondant Advocate Mr.R.S. Pimpalkar
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/1126(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/07/2010 in Case No. 361/08 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD36-38 A, NARIMAN BHAVAN 227 NARIMAN POINT MUMBAI MUMBAIMA...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Kotak Mahindra Prime in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Kotak Mahindra Prime ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Kotak Mahindra Prime under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.