company-name-logo

Institute

Latest Judgments

Total 3826 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.

Chandigarh

Frankfinn Institute V/S Cheshta Uppal

Institute  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

ORDER The parties have amicably settled the matter. As per settlement the authorized agent of OP has handed over two cheques of Rs.3000/- and 15000/- respectively to the complainant towards full and final settlement, which have been duly received by the complainant. Copies retai...

Case Number: 937

|

Date of Filing: 13-09-2019

|

Date of Upload: 21-11-2019

NCDRC

SAHARA INDIA MEDICAL INSTITUTE LIMITED. & ANR. V/S GYAN MISHRA

Sahara India   Sahara India   Medical   Institute  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate M/S KOHLI & SOBTI, MR. GAUTAM AWASTHI & AYUSH CHOUDHARY

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 998 OF 20151. GYAN MISHRAFlat No. 401, 57 Kheri House, Vishnupuri Colony, Church Road, Aliganj,Lucknow U.P. - 226 024...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SAHARA INDIA MEDICAL INSTITUTE LIMITED. & ANR.THROUGH ...

Case Number: 998

|

Date of Filing: 03-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 07-11-2019

West Bengal

Pinnacle Institute of Engineering and Management(PIEM) V/S Mr. Pinakpani Ghosh

Institute   Pinnacle  

Court Name: Jalpaiguri

Appelant Advocate Ujjal Chakraborty,

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, JALPAIGURI Miscellaneous Application No. MA/4/2019( Date of Filing : 31 Jul 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/24/20171. Mr. Pinakpani GhoshS/O Pijush Kanti Ghosh, R/O Shibaji Lane, Pandapara, Ward no.11 of JPG Municipality, P.S.- Kotwali, P...

Case Number: 4

|

Date of Filing: 31-07-2019

|

Date of Upload: 06-11-2019

Maharashtra

S.B.Jain Institute of Technology, Management & Research, Through its Chairman/Director V/S Tanmaya Subhash Waghmare

Institute  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate Adv. Prakash Shendre

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/138/2017( Date of Filing : 06 Mar 2017 )1. Tanmaya Subhash WaghmareR/o. Bhagyashri Nagar, Ramna Maroti Road, NagpurNagpurMaharashtra...

Case Number: 138

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 08-01-2020

West Bengal

Indian Institute of Hardware Technologies Ltd. (IIHT) and another V/S Shri Pulak Majumder

Institute  

Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inExecution Application No. EA/2/2019( Date of Filing : 07 Jan 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/09/1821. Shri Pulak Majumder14/1A, Baxi Bagan Lane, Mukh...

Case Number: 2

|

Date of Filing: 07-01-2019

|

Date of Upload: 25-10-2019

Chandigarh

Post Graduate Institute of Medicial Education & Reseach, Chandigarh V/S Smt. Darshani Devi Alias Darshani Sharma

Institute   Education  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Shaveta Sanghi & Lokesh Sharma Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:237 of 2019Date of Institution:18.10.2019Date of Decision:22.10.2019 Smt. Darshani Devi alias Darshani Sharma w/o Sh. Brij Bhushan Sharma r/o H.No.191, Ashoka Nursery, Karnal (Haryana).…..Appellant/Com...

Case Number: 237

|

Date of Filing: 18-10-2019

|

Date of Upload: 04-11-2019

Chandigarh

Post Graduate Institute of Medical & Education Research V/S Richa Verma

Medical   Institute   Education  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Devinder Singh Soundh Adv.

Respondant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj,Adv

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:148 of 2017Date of Institution:13.02.2017Date of Decision:16.10.2019Richa Verma wife of Sh.Nitish Sharma, aged 36 years, through SPA Smt.Indera Verma, resident of House NO.46-A, Street No.2,...

Case Number: 148

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 04-12-2019

Chandigarh

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research V/S Rajiv Sharma

Medical   Institute   Education  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Divay Sarup

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/434/2018Date of Institution:04/09/2018Date of Decision:15/10/2019Rajiv Sharma r/o 1723, Mauli Jagran, Chandigarh… ComplainantV E R S U S1. The Director, Post Graduate Institute of Medica...

Case Number: 434

|

Date of Filing: 04-09-2018

|

Date of Upload: 17-10-2019

Maharashtra

Orange City Hospital & Research Institute V/S Nawal Kumar Thakur

Hospital   Institute  

Court Name: Additional DCF, Nagpur

Appelant Advocate Adv. H.A. Khedikar

Respondant Advocate

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,NAGPURNew Administrative Building No.-13rd Floor, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440001Ph.0712-2546884Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/18/5701. Nawal Kumar ThakurR/o. NTPC Mouda, Tah. Mouda, Dist. NagpurNagpur Maharashtra2. Mrs. Poonam Nawal Th...

Case Number: 0

|

Date of Filing: 14-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 22-10-2019

Maharashtra

Shanti Education Foundation Waga Institute of Management & Reaserch through President Vishal Ashok C V/S Ku. Neha Suresh Tiwari

Institute   Education   Suresh  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate Anuradha Deshpande

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Execution Application No. EA/160/2015( Date of Filing : 09 Sep 2015 )InComplaint Case No. CC/12/4881. Ku. Neha Suresh TiwariPlot No 242,Kukde Lay out,Near...

Case Number: 160

|

Date of Filing: 09-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 10-10-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.