Government
Latest Judgments
Total 995 Consumer Court Cases Against Government.
1, Karnataka State Government D;Group Employees Assocation(R) V/S Sri Srinivasachar(Major)
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Execution Application No. EA/12/651. Sri Srinivasachar(Major)No 1267,12th Main Road,Raghavendra Block Srinagar,Bangalore 560050Bangalo...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Government Insurance fund Dirctroate Of Insurance Maharashtra State . V/S Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V.D.Salunke
Respondant Advocate
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.CC NO. 13 Of 20111. Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.Arvindnagar,Keshegaon,Tq.&Dist.Osmanabad.Osmanabad............Complainant(s)Versus1. Government Insurance fund Dirctr...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1. T. shahe Jashmi D/o. T.Shasha Peera, Minor Rep. by Next Friend Guardian/ Father T. Shasaha Peer V/S 1. Board of intermediate Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. Smt. Akella Padma
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/730/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/09/2012 in Case No. CC/145/2011 of District Anantapur)1. 1. Board of intermediate Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. Rep. by its secretary.2. 2. The Regional inspction Officer, Board of Intermediate Educat...
Case Number: 730
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
GEETA RANI KAKKAR & 2 ORS. V/S GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL
Hospital Medical Medical College Government
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAURAV M. LIBERHAN
Respondant Advocate MR. JAWAHAR NARANG
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4905 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/08/2012 in Appeal No. 257/2011 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITALThrough its Director Principal. Sector-32 CHANDIGARH......
Case Number: 4905
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2013
1. M/S CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES HOUSING ORGANISATION, MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND POVERTY V/S K.S.MURTHY, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, R/O FLAT NO.501,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S S.T.BASHA & ASSOCIATES, Mr. Nelson Mathew
Respondant Advocate M/s.S.Prabhakar Reddy - R1 and R2
First Appeal No. FA/666/2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/06/2011 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/89/2010 of District Rangareddi)1. K.S.MURTHY, S/O LATE SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, R/O FLAT NO.501,17, SNEHA ENCLAVE, PLOT NO.196, WEST MAREDPALLI, SECUNDERABAD............Appellant(s)Ve...
Case Number: 666
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
State Government of Haryana V/S Surinder Kumar Mittal
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. Surinder Kumar Mittal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 343 of 2012 1. Surinder Kumar MittalH.No. 306, Sector 12, Panchkula ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. State Government of Haryana through 1. The Chief S...
Case Number: 343
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MADAN MOHAN LAL SOBTI V/S GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & 6 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KUMAR RAJESH SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 123 OF 2013 IN RP/4818/20121. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & 6 ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. MADAN MOHAN LAL SOBTI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING M...
Case Number: 123
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2013
Karnataka State Government 'D' Group Employees Central Assocation V/S Sri K.R.Ragaswamy S/o Sri Kempaiah, Aged About 55 Years, Junior Assistant
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Execution Application No. EA/12/421. Sri K.R.Ragaswamy S/o Sri Kempaiah, Aged About 55 Years, Junior AssistantOffice of Karnataka Gove...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 26-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Oriental Insurance Company (A Government of India Undertaking) 6-2-976, "Capitol", Pavani Estate V/S Mr. K. Parthasarathy, S/o. Late Sri K. Srinivasachary, aged 40 Years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o. H.No. 12-11-1441, Boudhanagar, Warasiguda, Hyderabad.
The Oriental Insurance Oriental Insurance Government
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.M.R.B. Manikandan
Respondant Advocate M/s. K.N.V.Radha Krishna
FA No: 50 Of 2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/10/2011 in Case No. CC/1147/2010 of District Hyderabad-I)1. Mr. K. Parthasarathy, S/o. Late Sri K. Srinivasachary, aged 40 Years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o. H.No. 12-11-1441, Boudhanagar, Warasiguda, Hyderabad............Appellant(s...
Case Number: 50
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA & ORS. V/S SHABANA BEGUM
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SYED AHMED SAUD
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 851-852 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/11/2010 in Appeal No. 918-1096/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. SHABANA BEGUMR/o. Mannalli, Taluka ana DistrictBidarKarnataka...........Petitioner(s)...
Case Number: 851
|
Date of Filing: 10-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Government in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Government ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Government under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.