Government
Latest Judgments
Total 995 Consumer Court Cases Against Government.
Mr. K Joy John, Managing partner, Dev Dhan Lottery Services, Jyothis Project, DLS No.40/8942C, 2nd F V/S Narayanan P K, M48/2011, Government Quarters, Munderi, Kalpetta
Court Name: Wayanad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/3/20131. Narayanan P K, M48/2011, Government Quarters, Munderi, Kalpetta Wayanadkerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Mr. K Joy John, Managing partner, Dev Dhan Lottery Services, Jyothis Project, DLS No.40/8942C, 2nd Floor,CRH complex, MG road,Ernakulam.Ke...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
K Joy John, Managing Partner, Dev Dhan Lottery Services, Jyothis Project, DLS No.40/8942C, 2nd Floor V/S Sadanandan P K, Government Quarters, NO.48/2011, Munderi, Kalpetta.
Court Name: Wayanad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/7/20131. Sadanandan P K, Government Quarters, NO.48/2011, Munderi, Kalpetta.WayanadKerala............Complainant(s)Versus1. K Joy John, Managing Partner, Dev Dhan Lottery Services, Jyothis Project, DLS No.40/8942C, 2nd Floor, CRH complex, MG road,Ernakulam.K...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1. Smt. C.Devayani, D/o. Sri Venkatswamy, Aged 42 Years, Occ: Central Government Employee, D.No.16-1 V/S K. Sudhakar Rao, S/o. K. Ramaiah, Aged 42 Years, Occ: Pvt. Service, R/o. Flat No.602, SCK Residency, Red Hills, Hyderabad-04.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. A.P Venu Gopal
Respondant Advocate Mr.V.Gourishankar Rao
RP No. 60 Of 2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/09/2013 in Case No. CC/435/2012 of District Hyderabad-II)1. K. Sudhakar Rao, S/o. K. Ramaiah, Aged 42 Years, Occ: Pvt. Service, R/o. Flat No.602, SCK Residency, Red Hills, Hyderabad-04............Appellant(s)Versus1. 1. Smt. C.Devaya...
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M. Praveen, S/o. David, Aged about 32 Years, Occ: Central Government Employee, R/o. H.No.2-19-50, ka V/S Gopi Solomon, S/o. Paul, Aged about 50 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.1-30-613, "Shivanagar Thirumalghery, Secunderabad.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.S. Bhooma Goud,
Respondant Advocate Mr.G. Venakat Reddy
FA No: 230 Of 2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/01/2013 in Case No. CC/180/2010 of District Rangareddi)1. Gopi Solomon, S/o. Paul, Aged about 50 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No.1-30-613, "Shivanagar Thirumalghery, Secunderabad............Appellant(s)Versus1. M. Praveen, S/o. Davi...
Case Number: 230
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1. Sri Col (Retd) Sunil Kumar, chief Executive Officer, (CEO),Central Government Employees Welfare H V/S Thota Chandra Sekhara Reddy, Flat No.209, " Sri Krishan Ambhas" Apartments, Near Janpriya Utopriya, Hyderguda, Attapur, Ranga Reddy District. Hyderabad-500 048. A.P.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. Thota Chandra Sekhara Reddy (P I P)
Respondant Advocate Mr.J.Prabhakar
FA No: 468 Of 2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/06/2013 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/47/2012 of District Rangareddi)1. Thota Chandra Sekhara Reddy, Flat No.209, " Sri Krishan Ambhas" Apartments, Near Janpriya Utopriya, Hyderguda, Attapur, Ranga Reddy District. Hyderabad-500 ...
Case Number: 468
|
Date of Filing: 20-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Government Multi-Specility Hospital V/S Mrs. Suman
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Pankaj Chandgothia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Jitender Singh, GP
Execution Application No. EA/21/20131. Mrs. SumanChandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Government Multi-Specility HospitalSector-16, Chandigarh through its Director-Principal/Medical Superintendent...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'AB...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1. GOVERNMENT OF AP., REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE, V/S 1. MRS. SWEENIE REDDY LOKA, W/O MR. P. RADHIVE REDDY, AGED 32 YEARS,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S P. RAJA SRIPATHI RAO
Respondant Advocate GP for state-OP1
Complaint Case No. CC/30/20121. 1. MRS. SWEENIE REDDY LOKA, W/O MR. P. RADHIVE REDDY, AGED 32 YEARS,R/O 104, GOURI APARTMENTS, URDU HALL LANE, HYDERABAD.2. 2.MR. P. RADHIVE REDDY, S/O MR. P. HANMANTH REDDY, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O 104, GOURI APARTMENTS, URDU HALL LANE, HYDERABAD.A.P.....
Case Number: 30
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1. GOVERNMENT OF AP., REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE, V/S 1. MRS. SWEENIE REDDY LOKA, W/O MR. P. RADHIVE REDDY, AGED 32 YEARS,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S P. RAJA SRIPATHI RAO
Respondant Advocate GP for state-OP1
Complaint Case No. CC/30/20121. 1. MRS. SWEENIE REDDY LOKA, W/O MR. P. RADHIVE REDDY, AGED 32 YEARS,R/O 104, GOURI APARTMENTS, URDU HALL LANE, HYDERABAD.2. 2.MR. P. RADHIVE REDDY, S/O MR. P. HANMANTH REDDY, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O 104, GOURI APARTMENTS, URDU HALL LANE, HYDERABAD.A.P.....
Case Number: 30
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Guna Simhachalam S/o.Ramulu, Age: 40 years,H.No.1-52, Dharma Neelapuram Village, Ravivalasa Post, Na V/S 1. The Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Opp: Government Junior college, Main Road, Narsanapeta though the Authorised Signatory T.K. Balkrishna S/o. Thirupalappa, Age:58 years,
Life Insurance Corporation Life Insurance Corporation Government
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.K. Venkatesh Gupta
Respondant Advocate Mr. Tejeswar Rao
FA No: 87 Of 2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/07/2012 in Case No. CC/31/2012 of District Srikakulam)1. 1. The Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Opp: Government Junior college, Main Road, Narsanapeta though the Authorised Signatory T.K. Balkrishna S/o. Thirupal...
Case Number: 87
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
CHAIRMAN, BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY & SANITARY BOARD & ANR. V/S DR. M. KALA, HOD & PROFESSOR, GOVERNMENT DENTAL COLLEGE
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJAT NAVET
Respondant Advocate MR. H. CHANDRA SEKHAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2022 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 15/02/2012 in Appeal No. 2075/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. DR. M. KALA, HOD & PROFESSOR, GOVERNMENT DENTAL COLLEGER/o 1106,1st Sector, HSR layoutBangal...
Case Number: 2022
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Government in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Government ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Government under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.